Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
July 2005
ISSN:
1613-0650
DOI:
10.1515/agph.2005.87.1.22

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 217.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 325.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 261.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 390.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Horn, Christoph / Serck-Hanssen, Camilla

Together with Mercer, Christia

3 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

The Wolffian Paradigm and its Discontent: Kant’s Containment Definition of Analyticity in Historical Context

R. Lanier Anderson1

1.

Citation Information: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 22–74, ISSN (Online) 1613-0650, ISSN (Print) 0003-9101, DOI: 10.1515/agph.2005.87.1.22, July 2005

Publication History:
Published Online:
2005-07-27

Abstract

I defend Kant’s definition of analyticity in terms of concept “containment”, which has engendered widespread scepticism. Kant deployed a clear, technical notion of containment based on ideas standard within traditional logic, notably genus/species hierarchies formed via logical division. Kant’s analytic/synthetic distinction thereby undermines the logico-metaphysical system of Christian Wolff, showing that the Wolffian paradigm lacks the expressive power even to represent essential knowledge, including elementary mathematics, and so cannot provide an adequate system of philosophy. The results clarify the extent to which analyticity sensu Kant can illuminate the problem of a priori knowledge generally.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.