Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
January 2012
ISSN:
1935-1704
DOI:
10.1515/1935-1704.1749

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 234.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 315.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 281.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 378.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Cervellati, Matteo / Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Schipper, Burkhard

1 Issue per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.490

Information Theory and Observational Limitations in Decision Making

David Wolpert1 / David S. Leslie2

1NASA Ames Research Center, Santa Fe Institute, and Los Alamos National Laboratory, david.h.wolpert@gmail.com

2University of Bristol, david.leslie@bristol.ac.uk

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics. Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, DOI: 10.1515/1935-1704.1749, January 2012

Publication History:
Published Online:
2012-01-24

We introduce a general framework for formalizing and analyzing the problem faced by a Decision Maker (DM) working under information-theoretic constraints on their observational ability. The random utility model and the "hedonic utility" model of Netzer and Robson (NR) are special cases of this framework. We begin by applying information theory to our framework to derive general results concerning the expected regret of DM under observational limitations. We then turn our attention to the effects of observational limitations on choice behavior (rather than their effects on the regret values induced by that behavior). We focus on the special case of NR. First we derive two postulates assumed by NR. We then provide a simple derivation of the result of NR that a particular hedonic utility function satisfies certain optimality principles. Next we extend NR to allow a countable, rather than uncountable, set of states of the world. In particular we show how to use dynamic programming to solve for the optimal preference order of DM in this extension. We also extend NR by considering the case where more than two options are presented to DM. In particular, we show that the results of NR change in such a case, implying that the number of options being presented is a crucial aspect of choice problems.

Keywords: hedonic utility; risk attitudes; S-shaped utility; decision theory; constrained observation; bounded rationality; information theory; regret

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.