Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

249,00 € / $374.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
February 2009
ISSN:
1437-4331
DOI:
10.1515/CCLM.2009.039

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 249.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 374.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1577.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2365.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1893.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2838.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Lippi, Giuseppe / Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Melichar, Bohuslav / Siest, Gérard / Whitfield, John B. / Abi Fadel, Marianne / Alvarez Menendez, Francisco V. / Azzazy, Hassan M.E. / Diamandis, Eleftherios P. / Eckardstein, Arnold / Favaloro, Emmanuel J. / Griesmacher, Andrea / Herrmann, Wolfgang / Hoffmann, Johannes J.M.L. / Hooijkaas, Herbert / Ichihara, Kiyoshi / Kaabachi, Naziha / Kim, Jeong-Ho / Korte, Wolfgang / Kroupis, Christos / Lai, Leslie Charles / Lam, Wai Kei Christopher / Marc, Janja / Miyoshi, Eiji / Özben, Tomris / Palicka, Vladimir / Panteghini, Mauro / Queralto, Jose M. / Scartezini, Marileia / Simundic, Ana-Maria / Tsongalis, Gregory J. / Wallemacq, Pierre E. / Yan, Shengkai / Young, Ian S. / Chiu, Rossa Wai Kwun / Ghosh, Debabrata / Kappelmayer, Janos / Lehmann, Sylvain / Sypniewska, Grazyna

12 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 2.150
Rank 10 out of 32 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Comparison of calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, zinc, and creatinine concentration in 24-h and spot urine samples in women

Jasminka Z. Ilich1 / Maja Blanuša2 / Željka Crnčević Orlić3 / Tatjana Orct4 / Krista Kostial5

1Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

2Analytical Toxicology and Mineral Metabolism Unit, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia

3Endocrinology Department, Clinical Hospital, Rijeka, Croatia

4Analytical Toxicology and Mineral Metabolism Unit, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia

5Analytical Toxicology and Mineral Metabolism Unit, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia

Corresponding author: Jasminka Ilich, PhD, RD, Professor, Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, 120 Convocation Way, 418 Sandels Bldg, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1493, USA Phone: +1-850-645-7177, Fax: +1-850-645-5000,

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 216–221, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.039, February 2009

Publication History:
Received:
2008-09-06
Accepted:
2008-11-03
Published Online:
2009-02-04

Abstract

Background: The 24-h urine sample is considered as the most reliable material for testing many but not necessarily all constituents in urine. However, its collection is tedious for both patients and research participants. The aim of this study was to compare concentrations of essential elements calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), potassium (K), and zinc (Zn) in 24-h and spot urine samples.

Methods: Urine samples were collected from 143 generally healthy women, aged 30–79 years. Fasting spot urine was collected immediately after the end of the 24-h collection, therefore being of the same content as the first morning urine which ended the 24-h collection. Elements were analyzed by flame atomic absorption/emission spectrometry and expressed as mg/g and/or mmol/mol of creatinine (Cr). Spearman rank order correlations between 24-h and spot urine were carried out for each element. Ratios of elements in 24-h to spot urine samples were calculated to estimate the element-proportion of spot in the 24-h sample.

Results: All coefficients of correlation between 24-h and spot urine of measured elements and Cr were significant (p<0.05): Zn (0.637), Mg (0.623), Ca (0.603), Na (0.452), K (0.396), and Cr (0.217). Ratios of 24-h to spot urine samples for each element (except K) were similar and close to 2, indicating uniform proportion of elements from spot urine sample in the 24-h sample. In addition, a high correlation between various pairs of elements was obtained in both 24-h and spot urine; the highest being between Na/Ca (0.435) and (0.578), respectively. This is in accordance with theoretical presumptions and previous findings regarding those relationships.

Conclusions: Although replacing burdensome 24-h urine collection with spot urine sampling might not provide the solution in all cases, our results show that for the elements analyzed, spot urine could be a reliable alternative.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:216–21.

Keywords: correlation; essential minerals; healthy females, urine

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.