Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
September 2006
ISSN:
1614-9939
DOI:
10.1515/ERCL.2006.018

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 285.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 428.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 342.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 514.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
VolumeIssuePage

Abuse of Dominant Position: A System of Undistorted Competition or Social Protection?

Maria Rosaria Maugeri1

1

Citation Information: European Review of Contract Law. Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 250–256, ISSN (Online) 1614-9939, ISSN (Print) 1614-9920, DOI: 10.1515/ERCL.2006.018, September 2006

Publication History:
Published Online:
2006-09-28

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate that, even if Article 82(2)(a) of the EC Treaty does not replace the market measure with a political measure with respect to contractual clauses, nonetheless it pursues social justice, whatever conception of social justice one accepts. According to a vast majority of Economics scholars, such regulation is wholly inefficient. The rule, as it stands, is supported by evidently equitable reasons: it is designed, in fact, to protect a specific class of consumers, particularly those who cannot afford innovation at a monopolistic price. This regulation has been harshly criticised, and has undergone several attempts to reduce its scope of application. I believe that a group that is concerned about social justice in European contract law cannot allow this norm to be disregarded and should, instead, invoke its application.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.