In his article on President Bushs second term economic agenda, Professor Mankiw is vague and misleading with regard to the costs and benefits of partial privatization of social security reform. There are other, simpler ways to fix the problem of Social Security which Mankiw fails to mention. In addition, the Chilean experience suggests that privitization may be more costly than anticipated and benefits more difficult to cut, at least for those who lose their money in private investments.

Ed. by Cragg, Michael / Edlin, Aaron S. / Jaffee, Dwight / Stiglitz, Joseph / Zwiebel, Jeffrey
1 Issue per year
Issues
Volume 9 (2012)
Volume 8 (2011)
Volume 7 (2010)
Volume 6 (2009)
Volume 5 (2008)
Volume 4 (2007)
Volume 3 (2006)
Volume 2 (2005)
Volume 1 (2004)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Occupy Wall Street and the Political Economy of Inequality by Dube, Arindrajit and Kaplan, Ethan
- The Cost of Job Loss in the Great Recession: How Bad Has it Been? by Farber, Henry S.
- Stimulating the Economy in an Era of Debt and Deficit by Stiglitz, Joseph E.
- The Gender Pay Gap by Blau, Francine D and Kahn, Lawrence M
- Investment Banking Regulation After Bear Stearns by Jaffee, Dwight M. and Perlow, Mark
Radical Social Security Reform Is Not Needed: a Letter Commenting on "The Economic Agenda" by N. Gregory Mankiw
Manuel R Agosin1
1Inter-American Development Bank
Citation Information: The Economists' Voice. Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1553-3832, DOI: 10.2202/1553-3832.1056, January 2005
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2005-01-14
Keywords: Social Security; Fiscal Policy


















Comments (0)