Malaysia's National Economic Policy was formulated with two objectives: to eradicate poverty and restructure society. In this article we trace the origins of the policy and review it from a legal perspective. We found that although the policy is not law in the sense used by traditional model jurisprudence, it has nevertheless been adhered to. We argue that this adherence was not because of any moral obligation to comply or that it reflected popular consciousness, but because of the prevailing political and institutional structures which allows the state to impose non-legal sanctions. Thus, although not law, the policy carries with it the state's coercive powers to induce compliance.

Ed. by Mattei, Ugo / Monti, Alberto
3 Issues per year
Issues
Volume 12 (2012)
Volume 11 (2011)
Volume 10 (2010)
Volume 9 (2009)
Volume 8 (2008)
Volume 7 (2007)
Volume 5 (2005)
Volume 4 (2005)
Volume 3 (2003)
Volume 2 (2002)
Volume 1 (2001)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Definition of "Investment": Could a Persistent Objector to the Salini Tests be Found in ICSID Arbitral Practice? by Martin, Antoine
- Comparative Personal Property: The Case of Shares by Pretto, Arianna
- Female Circumcision as Female Genital Mutilation: Human Rights or Cultural Imperialism? by Oba, Abdulmumini A
- The E-Commerce Directive and Formation of Contract in a Comparative Perspective by Ramberg, Christina Hultmark
- The International Legal Personality of Multinational Enterprises: Treaty, Custom and the Governance Gap by Hansen, Robin F.
The Boundaries of Law: A Socio-Legal Perspective of Malaysia's National Economic Policy
1The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, mohammad.rizal@nottingham.edu.my
2University of Malaya, zalina@um.edu.my
Citation Information: Global Jurist. Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1934-2640, DOI: 10.2202/1934-2640.1260, October 2008
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2008-10-09
Keywords: National Economic Policy; NEP; socio-legal; law; constitution; democracy; Malaysia


















Comments (0)