Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
March 2009
ISSN:
1613-365X
DOI:
10.1515/IPRG.2009.001

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 218.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 327.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 262.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 393.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Kecskes, Istvan

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.905
ERIH category 2011: INT2

VolumeIssuePage

Face and self-presentation in spoken L2 discourse: Renewing the research agenda in interlanguage pragmatics

Doris Dippold

Citation Information: Intercultural Pragmatics. Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 1–28, ISSN (Online) 1613-365X, ISSN (Print) 1612-295X, DOI: 10.1515/IPRG.2009.001, March 2009

Publication History:
Published Online:
2009-03-18

Abstract

This paper introduces a more nuanced view of face and facework than the commonly used frameworks in interlanguage pragmatics. It argues that ILP not only prioritizes research on the expression of politeness in the L2 and the acquisition of politeness strategies, but that the field also does that in an extremely decontextualized manner that takes little account of the situatedness of linguistic discourse. Moreover, the paper suggests that existing accounts of face and facework with their focus on politeness alone may not be sufficient to capture speakers' projection of other aspects of self-hood, i.e. the social identities and/or attributes that they want to foreground and be attributed with in particular situations.

By analyzing an argumentative conversation of two L2 learners of German, the paper shows different ways in which self-presentation is performed, e.g., by the way speakers organize their turns, the way they modalize their discourse, and the way they use markers of reference and identity. It then argues that the field of interlanguage pragmatic should move away from its focus on politeness in a limited set of speech acts and focus also on self-presentation.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.