Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
March 2010
ISSN:
1613-4141
DOI:
10.1515/iral.2010.002

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 272.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 409.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 327.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 491.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Jordens, Peter / Roberts, Leah

4 Issues per year

ERIH category 2011: INT2

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Using conventional sequences in L2 French

Fanny Forsberg1

1Stockholm University. <fanny.forsberg@fraita.su.se>

Citation Information: IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 25–51, ISSN (Online) 1613-4141, ISSN (Print) 0019-042X, DOI: 10.1515/iral.2010.002, March 2010

Publication History:
Published Online:
2010-03-19

Abstract

By means of a phraseological identification method, this study provides a general description of the use of conventional sequences (CSs) in interviews at four different levels of spoken L2 French as well as in interviews with native speakers. Use of conventional sequences is studied with regard to overall quantity, category distribution and type frequencies. The most predictive measure is overall quantity, which yields significant differences between several learner levels. It is also found that Lexical CSs are the most difficult to acquire for second language speakers: only the most advanced group use them to the same extent as native speakers. No significant differences are found between the most advanced group of L2 speakers (LOR in France >5 yrs) and native speakers, probably due to the measures and the task investigated. The results are then related to Ellis et al. (TESOL Quarterly 42: 375–396, 2008), suggesting that the sequences' frequencies of occurrence vs. their MI score in a larger corpus might influence their acquisition and use.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.