Considerations on the Notion of Moral Validity in the Moral Theories of Kant and Habermas : Kant Studien

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Kant-Studien

Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft

Ed. by Baum, Manfred / Dörflinger, Bernd / Klemme, Heiner F.


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.161
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.421
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.115

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Considerations on the Notion of Moral Validity in the Moral Theories of Kant and Habermas

Pablo Gilabert1

1

Citation Information: Kant Studien. Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages 210–227, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: 10.1515/KANT.2006.012, August 2006

Publication History

Published Online:
2006-08-10

Abstract

In what follows I will consider Kant's and Habermas's conceptions of moral validity in a comparative and critical way. First, I will reconstruct Habermas's discursive or deliberative reformulation of Kant's moral theory (sec.1). And, second, I will introduce some comparative critical considerations (2). I will contend that, though much is gained with Habermas's intersubjectivist reformulation of Kant's moral philosophy, some problems emerge that could be treated with the help of certain Kantian insights. I will focus on Kant's and Habermas's strictly moral writings. The issue of political validity or legitimacy (i.e., of the validity of norms that are to be enforced by a coercive state apparatus) is of course of great importance, but I will not address it here.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.