Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
May 2009
ISSN:
1866-9859
DOI:
10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.006

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 281.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 422.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 338.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 507.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Language and Cognition

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language and Cognitive Science

Ed. by Casasanto, Daniel / Coulson, Seana / Evans, Vyvyan / Hart, Christopher / Kemmerer, David / Michaelis, Laura / Sinha, Chris

4 Issues per year

Episodic affordances contribute to language comprehension

Arthur M. Glenberg1 / Raymond Becker2 / Susann Klötzer3 / Lidia Kolanko3 / Silvana Müller3 / Mike Rinck4

1Arizona State University

2Wilfrid Laurier University

3Dresden University of Technology

4Radboud University Nijmegen

c1Correspondence address: Arthur Glenberg, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, 950 S. McAllister, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA. E-mail:

Citation Information: Language and Cognition. Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 113–135, ISSN (Online) 1866-9859, ISSN (Print) 1866-9808, DOI: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.006, May 2009

Publication History:
Published Online:
2009-05-14

Abstract

We demonstrate how a particular type of knowledge about objects, their spatial locations and thus how to direct actions toward them, contributes to the comprehension of language about those objects. In four experiments, participants judged if sentences were about normal objects (e.g., “The apple has a stem”) or odd objects (e.g., “The apple has an antenna”). The Normal response key was either on the left of a response box or on the right. The named objects were themselves either on the left or the right of the response box. We demonstrate a compatibility effect in which responding Normal to the side where the object was located was faster than responding Normal to the opposite side. Furthermore, this effect was equally strong for sentences describing states of the objects (as above) and sentences describing actions (e.g., “Touch the apple at the stem”); the compatibility effect was found when the objects were removed; the effect required compatibility between actions, not just spatial locations; and the effect was found in both English and German. The results are discussed in relation to how action systems are used in language comprehension.

Keywords: language comprehension; reading; affordances; embodiment; ACE

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.