Mihatsch, Wiltrud. "Experimental Data vs. Diachronic Typological Data:
Two Types of Evidence for Linguistic Relativity".
Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives, edited by Stephan Kepser and Marga Reis, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2005, pp. 371-392.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.371
Mihatsch, W. (2005). Experimental Data vs. Diachronic Typological Data:
Two Types of Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Ed.),
Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives (pp. 371-392). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.371
Mihatsch, W. 2005. Experimental Data vs. Diachronic Typological Data:
Two Types of Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. In: Kepser, S. and Reis, M. ed.
Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 371-392.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.371
Mihatsch, Wiltrud. "Experimental Data vs. Diachronic Typological Data:
Two Types of Evidence for Linguistic Relativity" In
Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives edited by Stephan Kepser and Marga Reis, 371-392. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2005.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.371
Mihatsch W. Experimental Data vs. Diachronic Typological Data:
Two Types of Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. In: Kepser S, Reis M (ed.)
Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton; 2005. p.371-392.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.371
Copied to clipboard