The aim of this paper is to stimulate a more systematic method of evolving standard, but evolutionary, rules of accounting. The conclusion, if sound, follows from two premises. First, rules of accounting have become, in large measure rules of law. Second, that the present methods by which accounting theory is translated into the accounting rules—or, if you choose, into accounting practices which thus enter the legal system, are not wholly satisfactory, especially in view of the results which now follow from that translation. By consequence, the task of developing a systematic yet flexible means of arriving at and recording the sound doctrine as it appears in the light of the knowledge of the day, takes the foreground as a major problem in the profession of accounting.

Accounting, Economics and Law
A Convivium
Ed. by Avi-Yonah, Reuven S. / Biondi, Yuri / Sunder, Shyam
2 Issues per year
Most Downloaded Articles
- What Do Shareholders Do? Accounting, Ownership and the Theory of the Firm: Implications for Corporate Governance and Reporting by Biondi, Yuri
- New Thinking on "Shareholder Primacy" by Stout, Lynn A.
- Firm, Property and Governance: From Berle and Means to the Agency Theory, and Beyond by Weinstein, Olivier
- Risk, Speculation, and OTC Derivatives: An Inaugural Essay for Convivium by Stout, Lynn A.
- The Heifer, The Goat and The Sheep in Company with The Lion by de la Fontaine, Jean
Accounting and the Law
Adolph A. Berle Jr.
1Columbia Law School
Citation Information: Accounting, Economics, and Law. Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 1–11, ISSN (Online) 2152-2820, DOI: 10.1515/2152-2820.1056, March 2012
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2012-03-14
Keywords: accounting and law; accounting regulation; accounting standard-setting


















Comments (0)