Etracker Debug:
	et_pagename = "Archiv f\u00FCr Geschichte der Philosophie|agph|C|[EN]"
	
        
Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie

Ed. by Horn, Christoph / Serck-Hanssen, Camilla

Together with Mercer, Christia

4 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Synthesis, Logical Forms, and the Objects of our Ordinary Experience Response to Michael Friedman

Béatrice Longuenesse1

1

Citation Information: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 199–212, ISSN (Online) 1613-0650, ISSN (Print) 0003-9101, DOI: 10.1515/agph.83.2.199, February 2008

Publication History

Published Online:
2008-02-27

Abstract

In the 82/2 (2000) issue of this journal, Michael Friedman has offered a stimulating discussion of my recent book, Kant and the Capacity to Judge. His conclusion is that on the whole I fail to do justice to what is most revolutionary about Kant's natural philosophy, and instead end up attributing to Kant a pre-Newtonian, Aristotelian philosophy of nature. This is because, according to Friedman, I put excessive weight on Kant's claim to have derived his categories from a set of logical forms of judgment which he inherits from a traditional Aristotelian logic. In taking Kant at his word on this point, I fail to give their full import to Kant's insights into the newly discovered applications of mathematical concepts and methods to the science of nature.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.