Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science

Journal of University of Zielona Gora and Lubuskie Scientific Society

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2013: 1.390
Rank 29 out of 59 in category Automation & Control Systems, 52 out of 121 in category Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and 45 out of 250 in category Mathematics, Applied in the 2013 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.661
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.563

Mathematical Citation Quotient 2013: 0.09

Open Access


Actuator fault diagnosis for flat systems: A constraint satisfaction approach

1Automatic Control Group, IMS-Lab Bordeaux University, 351 cours de la libération, 33405 Talence cedex, France

2CEDRIC-Lab National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts, 292, rue Saint-Martin, 75141 Paris, France

3Non-A Project INRIA-LNE Parc scientifique de la haute borne 40, Av. Halley, Bât. A, Park Plaza, 59650 Villeneuve d’Ascq, France

This content is open access.

Citation Information: International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science. Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 171–181, ISSN (Online) 2083-8492, ISSN (Print) 1641-876X, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2013-0014, March 2013

Publication History

Published Online:

This paper describes a robust set-membership-based Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI) technique for a particular class of nonlinear systems, the so-called flat systems. The proposed strategy consists in checking if the expected input value belongs to an estimated feasible set computed using the system model and the derivatives of the measured output vector. The output derivatives are computed using a numerical differentiator. The set-membership estimator design for the input vector takes into account the measurement noise thereby making the consistency test robust. The performances of the proposed strategy are illustrated through a three-tank system simulation affected by actuator faults.

Keywords : fault detection; input observer; flat systems; consistency techniques

  • Akhenak, A., Chadli, M., Maquin, D. and Ragot, J. (2003). Sliding mode multiple observer for fault detection and isolation, 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,Maui, HI, USA, Vol. 1, pp. 953-958.

  • Arangú, M. and Salido, M. (2011). A fine-grained arc-consistency algorithm for non-normalized constraint satisfaction problems, International Journal of AppliedMathematics and Computer Science 21(4): 733-744, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-011-0058-2. [CrossRef]

  • Berdjag, D., Christophe, C., Cocquempot, V. and Jiang, B. (2006). Nonlinear model decomposition for robust fault detection and isolation using algebraic tools, InternationalJournal of Innovative Computing, Information & Control2(6): 1337-1354.

  • Bernard, O. and Gouzé, J. (2004). Closed loop observers bundle for uncertain biotechnological models, Journal of ProcessControl 14(7): 765-774.

  • Besançon, G. and Zhang, Q. (2002). Further developments on nonlinear adaptive observers with application in fault detection, IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain, Vol. 15, Part 1, pp. 19-22.

  • Bokor, J. and Balas, G. (2004). Detection filter design for LPV systems: A geometric approach, Automatica40(3): 511-518. [CrossRef]

  • Bokor, J. and Szab, Z. (2009). Fault detection and isolation in nonlinear systems, Annual Reviews in Control33(2): 113-123. [CrossRef]

  • Caccavale, F. and Villani, L. (2004). An adaptive observer for fault diagnosis in nonlinear discrete-time systems, American Control Conference, Boston, MA, USA, Vol. 3, pp. 2463-2468.

  • Chen, J. and Patton, R. (1999). Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosisfor Dynamic Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.

  • Chen, W., Saif, M. and Soh, Y. (2000). A variable structure adaptive observer approach for actuator fault detection and diagnosis in uncertain nonlinear systems, American ControlConference, Chicago, IL, USA, Vol. 4, pp. 2674-2678.

  • Corless, M. and Tu, J. (1998). State and input estimation for a class of uncertain systems, Automatica 34(6): 757-764. [CrossRef]

  • De Persis, C. and Isidori, A. (2001). A geometric approach to nonlinear fault detection and isolation, IEEE Transactionson Automatic Control 46(6): 853-865.

  • De Persis, C. and Isidori, A. (2002). On the design of fault detection filters with game-theoretic-optimal sensitivity, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control12(8): 729-747.

  • Ding, S. (2008). Model-based Fault Diagnosis Techniques:Design Schemes, Algorithms, and Tools, Springer, Heidelberg/Berlin.

  • Ding, X. and Frank, P.M. (1993). An adaptive observer-based fault detection scheme for nonlinear dynamic systems, 12th IFAC World Congress, Sydney, Australia, Vol. 6, pp. 307-310.

  • Edwards, C. and Spurgeon, S.K. (2000). A sliding mode observer based FDI scheme for the ship benchmark, EuropeanJournal of Control 6(4): 341-356.

  • Fagarasana, I., Ploix, S. and Gentil, S. (2004). Causal fault detection and isolation based on a set-membership approach, Automatica 40(12): 2099-2110.

  • Fliess, M., Levine, J., Martin, P. and Rouchon, P. (1992). Sur les systmes non linaires diffrentiellement plats, Comptesrendus de l’Acadmie des sciences, Srie 1: Mathmatiques315(5): 619-624.

  • Gouzé, J., Rapaport, A. and Hadj-Sadok, M. (2000). Interval observers for uncertain biological systems, EcologicalModelling 133(1-2): 46-56.

  • Grenaille, S., Henry, D. and Zolghadri, A. (2008). A method for designing fault diagnosis filters for LPV polytopic systems, Journal of Control Science and Engineering (1): 1-11.

  • Ha, Q. and Trinh, H. (2004). State and input simultaneous estimation for a class of nonlinear systems, Automatica40(10): 1779-1785. [CrossRef]

  • Hakiki, K., Mazari, B., Liazid, A. and Djaber S. (2006). Fault reconstruction using sliding mode observers, AmericanJournal of Applied Sciences 3(1): 1669-1674.

  • Hansen, R. (2004). Global Optimization Using Interval Analysis, 2nd Edn., CRC, New York, NY.

  • Henry, D. and Zolghadri, A. (2004). Robust fault diagnosis in uncertain linear parameter-varying systems, IEEE InternationalConference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, TheHague, The Netherlands, Vol. 6, pp. 5165-5170.

  • Hermann, R. and Krener, A.J. (1977). Nonlinear controllability and observability, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control22(5): 728-740. [CrossRef]

  • Hwang, I., Kim, S., Kim, Y. and Seah, C.E. (2010). A survey of fault detection, isolation, and reconfiguration methods, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology18(3): 636-653.

  • Ingimundarson, A., Bravo, J., Puig, V., Alamo, T. and Guerra, P. (2009). Robust fault detection using zonotope-based set-membership consistency test, International Journal ofAdaptive Control and Signal Processing 23(4): 311-330.

  • Isermann, R. and Ball, P. (1997). Trends in the application of model-based fault detection and diagnosis of technical processes, Control Engineering Practice 5(5): 709-719. [CrossRef]

  • Jaulin, L. (2013). Combining interval analysis with flatness theory for state estimation of sailboat robots, Mathematicsin Computer Sciences 6(4): 347-359.

  • Jaulin, L., Kieffer, M., Didrit, O. and Walter, E. (2001). AppliedInterval Analysis, Springer, London.

  • Jaulin, L. and Walter, E. (1993). Set inversion via interval analysis for nonlinear bounded-error estimation, Automatica29(4): 1053-1064. [CrossRef]

  • Jiang, B., Staroswiecki, M. and Cocquempot, V. (2004). Fault estimation in nonlinear uncertain systems using robust/sliding-mode observers, IEE Proceedings ControlTheory and Applications 151(1): 29-37.

  • Join, C., Sira-Ramirez, H. and Fliess, M. (2005). Control of an uncertain three-tank system via on-line parameter identification and fault detection, IFAC World Congress,Prague, Czech Republic.

  • Kabore, R. and Wang, H. (2001). Design of fault diagnosis filters and fault-tolerant control for a class of nonlinear systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control46(11): 1805-1810. [CrossRef]

  • Korbicz, J., Kościelny, J.M., Kowalczuk, Z. and Cholewa, W. (Eds.) (2004). Fault Diagnosis: Models, Artificial Intelligence,Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.

  • Krantz, S. and Parks, H. (Eds.) (2002). The Implicit FunctionTheorem: History, Theory, and Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.

  • Lalami, A. and Combastel, C. (2006). Generation of set membership tests for fault diagnosis and evaluation of their worst case sensitivity, 6th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection,Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes,Beijing, China, pp. 569-574.

  • Levant, A. (1998). Robust exact differentiation via sliding mode technique, Automatica 34(3): 379-384. [CrossRef]

  • Levant, A. (2001). Higher order sliding modes and arbitrary order exact robust differentiation, European Control Conference,Porto, Portugal, pp. 996-1001.

  • Levant, A. (2003). Higher-order sliding modes, differentiation and output-feedback control, International Journal of Control76(9): 924-941. [CrossRef]

  • Liu, Y. (2009). Robust adaptive observer for nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics, Automatica 45(8): 1891-1895. [CrossRef]

  • Moisan, M., Bernard, O. and Gouzé, J. (2009). Near optimal interval observers bundle for uncertain bioreactors, Automatica45(1): 291-295. [CrossRef]

  • Moisan, M. and Bernard, O. (2006). Robust interval observers for uncertain chaotic systems, 45th IEEE Conferenceon Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 3712-3717.

  • Moore, R. (1966). Interval Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • Neumaier, A. (2004). Complete search in continuous global optimization and constraint satisfaction, Acta Numerica13: 271-369.

  • Orani, N., Pisano, A. and Usai, E. (2009). Fault detection and reconstruction for a three-tank system via high-order sliding-mode observer, IEEE Multi-conference on Systemsand Control (MSC), Saint-Petersburg, Russia, pp. 1714-1719.

  • Poulsen, N. and Niemann, H. (2008). Active fault diagnosis based on stochastic tests, International Journal of AppliedMathematics and Computer Science 18(4): 487-496, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-008-0043-6. [CrossRef]

  • Puig, V. (2010). Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control using set-membership approaches: Application to real case studies, International Journal of Applied Mathematicsand Computer Science 20(4): 619-635, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-010-0046-y. [CrossRef]

  • Puig, V., Quevedo, J., Escobet, T. and Stancu, R. (2003). Robust fault detection using linear interval observers, Proceedingsof the 5th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervisionand Safety of Technical Processes, SAFEPROCESS2003, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 609-614.

  • Ragot, J., Maquin, D. and Adrot, O. (2006). Parameter uncertainties characterisation for linear models, ComputerJournal: 16-20.

  • Raïssi, T., Videau, G. and Zolghadri, A. (2010). Interval observer design for consistency checks of nonlinear continuous-time systems, Automatica 46(3): 518-527. [CrossRef]

  • Sontag, E. and Wang, Y. (1991). I/O equations for nonlinear systems and observation spaces, 30th IEEE Conference onDecision and Control, Brighton, UK, pp. 720-725.

  • Stancu, A., Puig, V., Cuguer, P. and Quevedo, J. (2005). Benchmarking on approaches to interval observation applied to robust fault detection, in C. Jermann, A. Neumaier and D. Sam (Eds.), Global Optimizationand Constraint Satisfaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3478, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 336-336.

  • Theilliol, D., Noura, H. and Ponsart, J. (2002). Fault diagnosis and accommodation of a three-tank system based on analytical redundancy, ISA Transactions 41(3): 365-382. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  • Waltz, D.L. (1975). Generating semantic descriptions from drawings of scenes with shadows, in P.H. Winston (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 19-91.

  • Wang, H. (2003). Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control for non-Gaussian stochastic systems with random parameters, in F. Caccavale and L. Villani (Eds.), Fault Diagnosisand Fault Tolerance for Mechatronic Systems: Recent Advances, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Vol. 1, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 59-84.

  • Wang, H. and Daley, S. (1996). Actuator fault diagnosis: An adaptive observer-based technique, IEEE Transactions onAutomatic Control 41(7): 1073-1078.

  • Wang, H., Huang, Z. and Daley, S. (1997). On the use of adaptive updating rules for actuator and sensor fault diagnosis, Automatica33(2): 217-225. [CrossRef]

  • Wang, H. and Lin, W. (2000). Applying observer based FDI techniques to detect faults in dynamic and bounded stochastic distributions, International Journal of Control73(15): 1424-1436. [CrossRef]

  • Wang, H. and Noriega, R. (2001). Fault diagnosis for unknown non-linear systems via neural networks and its comparisons and combinations with recursive least-squares based techniques, Proceedings of the Institutionof Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systemsand Control Engineering 215(3): 261-278.

  • Yan, X. and Edwards, C. (2008). Adaptive sliding-mode-observer-based fault reconstruction for nonlinear systems with parametric uncertainties, IEEETransactions on Industrial Electronics 55(11): 4029-4036.

  • Zhang, Q., Basseville, M. and Benveniste, A. (1998). Fault detection and isolation in nonlinear dynamic systems: A combined inputoutput and local approach, Automatica34(11): 1359-1373. [CrossRef]

  • Zolghadri, A., Henry, D. and Monsion, M. (1996). Design of nonlinear observers for fault diagnosis: A case study, ControlEngineering Practice 4(11): 1535-1544.


Ramatou Seydou

Ramatou Seydou obtained her Master degree at the Aeronautical Maintenance Institute, Bordeaux University, France, in 2009. She is currently a Ph.D. student at the IMS Lab, Bordeaux University. The topic of her thesis is the design and development of set membership techniques and their application to fault detection and diagnosis.

Tarek Raissi

Tarek Rassi received the Engineer degree from Tunis National Engineering School in 2000, the DEA in automatic control from Lille Centrale Graduate School in 2001 and the Ph.D. degree from University Paris XII in 2004. From 2005 to 2011 he was an associate professor at the University of Bordeaux. He is currently at the National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts, Paris, France. He is a member of the IFAC TC on Modelling, Identification and Signal Processing. His research interests include fault detection and isolation, nonlinear systems estimation, interval analysis.

Ali Zolghadri

Ali Zolghadri is a full professor of control engineering with the University of Bordeaux, France. His main research interest is narrowing the gap between real world control engineering requirements and theoretical analysis and design techniques. His areas of expertise include model-based fault diagnosis, fault-tolerant control and guidance, health management and operational autonomy for complex safety-critical systems. He has published around 150 contributions including journal articles, book chapters and communications. He is a co-holder of 5 patents.

Denis Efimov

Denis Efimov received the Ph.D. degree in automatic control from the Saint-Petersburg State Electrical Engineering University (Russia) in 2001, and the Dr.Sc. degree in automatic control in 2006 from the Institute for Problems of Mechanical Engineering of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Saint-Petersburg). From 2000 to 2009 he was a research assistant at the Institute for Problems of Mechanical Engineering, RAS, Control of Complex Systems Laboratory. From 2006 to 2011 he was working in the LSS (Sup´elec, France), the Monteore Institute (University of Liege, Belgium) and the Automatic Control Group at the IMS Lab (University of Bordeaux I, France). In 2011 he joined the Non-A team at the INRIA Lille Center. He is a member of the IFAC TC on Adaptive and Learning Systems and a senior member of the IEEE. His main research interests include nonlinear oscillation analysis, observation and control and switched and hybrid system stability.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.