Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Anthropological Review

The Journal of Polish Anthropological Society

2 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.111
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.041

Open Access
VolumeIssuePage

Open Access

Writing with non-dominant hand: left-handers perform better with the right hand than right handers with the left

Kristina Laskowski1 / 1

1Biological Anthropology and Comparative Anatomy Unit, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia

This content is open access.

Citation Information: Anthropological Review. Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 129–136, ISSN (Online) 2083-4594, ISSN (Print) 1898-6773, DOI: 10.2478/v10044-012-0012-4, February 2013

Publication History

Published Online:
2013-02-20

Abstract

Adult volunteers (7 females, 7 males) aged between 19 and 51 years, 7 right-handers and 7 left-handers, were asked to complete re-training writing tasks by using their non-dominant hand over 10 consecutive days. It is possible for adults to learn quickly to write legibly with their non-dominant hand. Left handers have a higher legibility score initially although right-handers improved with training more than left-handers. Individual’s performance was unrelated to age and sex in the small sample studied.

Keywords: handedness; males; females; re-training; Edinburgh Questionnaire

  • Annett M. 2004. Hand preference observed in large healthy samples: Classification, norms and interpretations of increased non-right-handedness by the right shift theory. Br J Psychol 95:339-53. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

  • Bryden PJ, Roy EA. 2005. Unimanuel performance across the age span. Brain Cogn 57:26-29. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  • Büsch D, Hagemann N, Bender N. 2010. The dimensionality of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory: An analysis with models of the item response theory. Laterality 15(6):610-28. [Web of Science] [PubMed]

  • Chapman JA, Henneberg M. 1999. Switching the handedness of adults: results of 10 weeks training of the non-dominant hand, Perspectives in Human Biology 4(1):211-17.

  • Doyen A-L, Dufour T, Caroff X, Cherfouh A, Carlier M. 2008. Hand preference and hand performance: Cross-sectional developmental trends and family resemblance in degree of laterality. Laterality 13(2):179-97. [Web of Science] [PubMed]

  • Gonzalez CL, Ganel T, Goodale MA. 2006. Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. J Neurophysiol 95:3496-501. doi:10.1152/jn.01187.2005. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  • Kalisch T, Wilimzig C, Kleibel N, Tegenthoff M, and Dinse HR. 2006. Age-Related Attenuation of Dominant Hand Superiority. PLoS ONE 1(1):e90. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.000009 [PubMed] [CrossRef]

  • Kim Yong-Kyu. 2009. Handbook of behavior genetics. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.

  • Klöppel S, Vongerichten A, van Eimeren T, Frackowiak RSJ, Siebner HR. 2007. Can left-landedness be switched? Insights from an early switch of handwriting. J Neurosci 27(29):7847-53. [Web of Science] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

  • Króliczak G, Piper BJ, Frey SH. 2011. Atypical lateralization of language predicts cerebral asymmetries in parietal gesture representations. Neuropsychologia 49:1698-702. [CrossRef] [Web of Science] [PubMed]

  • Teixeira LA. 2000. Categories of manual asymmetry and their variation with advancing age. Cortex 44(6):707-16. doi:10.1016/j. cortex.2006.10.002 Vuoksimaa E, Koskenvuo M, Rose RJ, Kaprio J. 2009. Origins of handedness: A nationwide study of 30 161 adults. Neuropsychologia 47:1294 -301. [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • Walker I, Henneberg M. 2007. Writing with non-dominant hand: cross-handedness trainability in adult individuals. [PubMed]

  • Laterality 12(2):121-30. doi:10.1080/ 13576500600989665 [PubMed] [CrossRef]

  • Zverev YP. 2006. Cultural and environmental pressure against left-hand preference in urban and semi-urban Malawi. Brain Cogn 60:295-303. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.