Volume 18 (2016)
Volume 17 (2015)
Volume 16 (2014)
Volume 15 (2013)
Volume 14 (2012)
Volume 13 (2011)
Volume 12 (2010)
Volume 11 (2009)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Regulation and Economic Globalization: Prospects and Limits of Private Governance by Mayer, Frederick and Gereffi, Gary
- Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P)Review by Büthe, Tim
- All politics is local, but lobbying is federal and local: the validity of LDA data by Clemens, Austin C.
- Corporate Political Donations: Investment or Agency? by Aggarwal, Rajesh K./ Meschke, Felix and Wang, Tracy Yue
Digital Television and the Quid Pro Quo
1American Enterprise Institute
2Caltech and University of Southern California
Citation Information: Business and Politics. Volume 2, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) 1469-3569, DOI: 10.2202/1469-3569.1006, August 2000
- Published Online:
The recent zero-priced award of $11-70 billion in digital TV (DTV) licenses by the federal government occurred when auctions had been initiated for non-broadcast licenses and when the seven decade-old regime of 'public trusteeship' in broadcasting had become famous for licensee reneging on promised obligations. Policymakers nonetheless declined to auction DTV licenses when enacting the Telecommunications Act of 1996, rejecting a plea from the Senate Majority Leader. This paper provides an overview of the episode and investigates three basic questions. (1) Why does Congress continue a regulatory system that routinely fails to provide the benefits it is supposed to generate? (2) Why did the National Association of Broadcasters propose high definition television as a way of keeping land mobile operators off an unused spectrum? (3) Why did Congress delegate to the FCC the decision to award licenses for digital television broadcasting?
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.