The recent zero-priced award of $11-70 billion in digital TV (DTV) licenses by the federal government occurred when auctions had been initiated for non-broadcast licenses and when the seven decade-old regime of 'public trusteeship' in broadcasting had become famous for licensee reneging on promised obligations. Policymakers nonetheless declined to auction DTV licenses when enacting the Telecommunications Act of 1996, rejecting a plea from the Senate Majority Leader. This paper provides an overview of the episode and investigates three basic questions. (1) Why does Congress continue a regulatory system that routinely fails to provide the benefits it is supposed to generate? (2) Why did the National Association of Broadcasters propose high definition television as a way of keeping land mobile operators off an unused spectrum? (3) Why did Congress delegate to the FCC the decision to award licenses for digital television broadcasting?

Editor-in-Chief: Aggarwal, Vinod K.
3 Issues per year
Issues
Volume 15 (2013)
Volume 14 (2012)
Volume 13 (2011)
Volume 12 (2010)
Volume 11 (2009)
Volume 10 (2008)
Volume 8 (2006)
Volume 7 (2005)
Volume 6 (2004)
Volume 5 (2003)
Volume 4 (2002)
Volume 3 (2001)
Volume 2 (2000)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Multilateralism and the Multinational Enterprise by Lawton, Thomas C/ Lindeque, Johan P. and McGuire, Steven M
- Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences by Macher, Jeffrey T and Richman, Barak D
- Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P)Review by Büthe, Tim
- Corporate Political Donations: Investment or Agency? by Aggarwal, Rajesh K./ Meschke, Felix and Wang, Tracy Yue
- China's Changing Guanxi Capitalism: Private Entrepreneurs between Leninist Control and Relentless Accumulation by McNally, Christopher A
Digital Television and the Quid Pro Quo
Thomas W. Hazlett / Matthew L. Spitzer
1American Enterprise Institute
1Caltech and University of Southern California
Citation Information: Business and Politics. Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1469-3569, DOI: 10.2202/1469-3569.1006, August 2000
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2000-08-01


















Comments (0)