Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
August 2000
ISSN:
1469-3569
DOI:
10.2202/1469-3569.1006

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 168.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 226.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 202.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 272.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Aggarwal, Vinod K.

3 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

Digital Television and the Quid Pro Quo

Thomas W. Hazlett / Matthew L. Spitzer

1American Enterprise Institute

1Caltech and University of Southern California

Citation Information: Business and Politics. Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1469-3569, DOI: 10.2202/1469-3569.1006, August 2000

Publication History:
Published Online:
2000-08-01

The recent zero-priced award of $11-70 billion in digital TV (DTV) licenses by the federal government occurred when auctions had been initiated for non-broadcast licenses and when the seven decade-old regime of 'public trusteeship' in broadcasting had become famous for licensee reneging on promised obligations. Policymakers nonetheless declined to auction DTV licenses when enacting the Telecommunications Act of 1996, rejecting a plea from the Senate Majority Leader. This paper provides an overview of the episode and investigates three basic questions. (1) Why does Congress continue a regulatory system that routinely fails to provide the benefits it is supposed to generate? (2) Why did the National Association of Broadcasters propose high definition television as a way of keeping land mobile operators off an unused spectrum? (3) Why did Congress delegate to the FCC the decision to award licenses for digital television broadcasting?

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.