Transnational Private Regulation in Practice: The Limits of Forest and Labor Standards Certification in Indonesia : Business and Politics Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Business and Politics

Editor-in-Chief: Aggarwal, Vinod K.


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.384
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.352
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.459

49,00 € / $74.00 / £37.00*

Online
ISSN
1469-3569
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Transnational Private Regulation in Practice: The Limits of Forest and Labor Standards Certification in Indonesia

Tim Bartley1

1Indiana University

Citation Information: Business and Politics. Volume 12, Issue 3, ISSN (Online) 1469-3569, DOI: 10.2202/1469-3569.1321, October 2010

Publication History

Published Online:
2010-10-28

Systems for certifying sustainable resource use and decent labor conditions have become prominent modes of private regulation at the transnational level. But serious questions remain about how these global standards are put into practice in particular places, especially in developing countries. Drawing on fieldwork in Indonesia, this paper examines the growth of certification of sustainable forestry (e.g., through the Forest Stewardship Council) and certification of decent labor conditions in factories (e.g., through Social Accountability International). Based on the controversy that surrounded both sweatshops and deforestation in Indonesia, and the export dependence of both the apparel/footwear and forest products sectors, these would appear to be prime candidates for the application of certification. Yet in both sectors, the growth of multi-stakeholder certification has been limited. Furthermore, private regulation in Indonesia has taken somewhat divergent paths in these two sectors, which shapes certification’s significance at the point of production. The paper examines how the socio-legal context of certification, the character of supply chain relationships, and possible differences in the politics of labor and the environment can help to explain these patterns and contribute to a richer sense of private regulation’s “on the ground” manifestations.

Keywords: regulation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Alejandro Milcíades Peña
Regulation & Governance, 2015, Page n/a
[3]
Khalid Nadvi and Gale Raj-Reichert
Regulation & Governance, 2015, Page n/a
[5]
Alejandro Milcíades Peña
Critical perspectives on international business, 2014, Volume 10, Number 4, Page 310
[6]
John Humphrey, Stephen Spratt, Jodie Thorpe, and Spencer Henson
IDS Working Papers, 2014, Volume 2014, Number 440, Page 1
[7]
F. Gale
Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 2014, Volume 21, Number 4, Page 396
[8]
Tim Bartley
Regulation & Governance, 2014, Volume 8, Number 1, Page 93
[11]
Krystof Obidzinski, Ikuko Takahashi, Ahmad Dermawan, Heru Komarudin, and Agus Andrianto
Land Use Policy, 2013, Volume 30, Number 1, Page 952
[12]
Peter Vandergeest and Anusorn Unno
Political Geography, 2012, Volume 31, Number 6, Page 358
[13]
Thomas Hale and David Held
Global Policy, 2012, Volume 3, Number 2, Page 169
[14]
Thomas Lawton, Steven McGuire, and Tazeeb Rajwani
International Journal of Management Reviews, 2013, Volume 15, Number 1, Page 86

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.