Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
January 2006
ISSN:
1935-1682
DOI:
10.2202/1538-0645.1387

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 345.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 473.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 414.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 568.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Friebel, Guido / Ludwig, Sandra / Requate, Till / Schneider, Hilmar / Tsui, Kevin / Wichardt, Philipp

2 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.550

 

 

VolumeIssuePage

Can Supply Restrictions Lower Price? Violence, Drug Dealing and Positional Advantage

Jonathan P Caulkins1 / Peter Reuter2 / Lowell J Taylor3

1Carnegie Mellon University, caulkins@andrew.cmu.edu

2University of Maryland, preuter@umd.edu

3Carnegie Mellon University, lt20@andrew.cmu.edu

Citation Information: Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy. Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1538-0645, DOI: 10.2202/1538-0645.1387, January 2006

Publication History:
Published Online:
2006-01-24

Abstract

The standard model of markets for illicit drugs predicts that tougher enforcement against sellers will raise prices; yet cocaine and heroin prices have fallen substantially during a period of massive increases in enforcement. We present a model in which the basic mechanisms at work in the textbook model may be substantially altered by an important feature of illegal markets—violence that creates inheritable heterogeneity along a dimension that both determines relevant production cost and imposes externalities on other suppliers. Dealers frequently make use of violence and threat of violence in the normal course of trade. A seller who is particularly effective in the use of violence may face lower enforcement costs than other dealers and generate an external cost borne by those sellers. Together these features generate a number of counter-intuitive policy implications. For example the arrest of a particularly violent dealer reduces external costs borne by other dealers. The net effect is a possible reduction in costs for the marginal dealer and hence a reduction in price.

Keywords: drug markets; illegal drugs; positional advantage in markets

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.