What Did the "Illegitimacy Bonus" Reward? : Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Zulehner, Christine / Schirle, Tammy


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 0.336
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.848

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.633
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.606
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.640

VolumeIssuePage

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

What Did the "Illegitimacy Bonus" Reward?

Sanders Korenman1 / Ted Joyce2 / Robert Kaestner3 / Jennifer Walper4

1Baruch College, CUNY and NBER,

2Baruch College, City University of NY,

3University of Illinois at Chicago,

4Baruch College, CUNY,

Citation Information: Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy. Volume 6, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1538-0653, DOI: 10.2202/1538-0653.1402, April 2006

Publication History

Published Online:
2006-04-18

Abstract

The Out-Of-Wedlock Birth Reduction Bonus (“Illegitimacy Bonus”), part of the 1996 welfare reform legislation, awarded up to $100 million in each of five years to the five states with the greatest reduction in the non-marital birth ratio. Alabama, Michigan, and Washington D.C. each won bonuses four or more times, claiming nearly 60% of award monies. However, for these bonus winners, changes in the racial composition of births accounted for between one-third and 100% of the decline in the non-marital birth ratio. The non-marital birth ratio fell most in D.C., averaging 1.5 percentage points per year over the award period. Declines in non-marital birth ratios in Michigan and Alabama were slight. But the non-marital birth ratio fell in D.C. in large part because the number of black children born there fell dramatically, and a decline in the black population alone accounted for one third of the decline in black births. Within-race changes in non-marital birth ratios raised the overall non-marital birth ratio 0.5 percentage points in Alabama, and lowered the non-marital ratio by one percentage point in Michigan, and by about three percentage points in Washington D.C. Because it was based on unadjusted changes in states’ aggregate non-martial birth ratios, the Illegitimacy Bonus rewarded racial/ethnic compositional changes at least as much as it rewarded declining non-marital birth ratios within major racial/ethnic groups.

Keywords: Illigitimacy bonus; birth-ratios; birth-reduction bonus

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.