Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
May 2007
ISSN:
1935-1682
DOI:
10.2202/1935-1682.1487

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 345.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 473.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 414.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 568.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Friebel, Guido / Ludwig, Sandra / Requate, Till / Schneider, Hilmar / Tsui, Kevin / Wichardt, Philipp

2 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.550

 

 

VolumeIssuePage

Vaccination Externalities

Bryan L. Boulier1 / Tejwant S. Datta2 / Robert S Goldfarb3

1The George Washington University, mortile@gwu.edu

2Albert Einstein Medical Center, tejdatta@yahoo.com

3George Washington University, gldfrb@gwu.edu

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.1487, May 2007

Publication History:
Published Online:
2007-05-16

Abstract

Vaccination provides indirect benefits to the unvaccinated. Despite its important policy implications, there is little analytical or empirical work to quantify this externality, nor is it incorporated in a number of cost-benefit studies of vaccine programs. We use a standard epidemiological model to analyze how the magnitude of this externality varies with the number of vaccinations, vaccine efficacy, and disease infectiousness. We also provide empirical estimates using parameters for influenza and mumps epidemics. The pattern of the externality is complex and striking, unlike that suggested in standard treatments. The size of the externality is not necessarily monotonic in the number vaccinated, vaccine efficacy, nor disease infectiousness. Moreover, its magnitude can be remarkably large. In particular, the marginal externality of a vaccination can be greater than one case of illness prevented among the nonvaccinated, so its omission from policy analyses implies serious biases.

Keywords: externality; vaccination; public health; epidemic; influenza; mumps; epidemiological models

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.