Understanding Participation in Social Programs: Why Don't Households Pick up the Lifeline? : The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Zulehner, Christine / Schirle, Tammy


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.825

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.501
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.418
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.455

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

Understanding Participation in Social Programs: Why Don't Households Pick up the Lifeline?

Mark Burton1 / Jeffrey Macher2 / John W Mayo3

1University of Tennessee,

2Georgetown University,

3Georgetown University,

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. Volume 7, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.1583, November 2007

Publication History

Published Online:
2007-11-06

Abstract

In this study, we draw upon data from the low-income Lifeline Assistance Program (Lifeline) for telephone service to examine the participation of eligible households in social programs designed to alleviate financial hardship. Utilizing panel data on participation levels in 1997 and 2003 and the associated variation in state-level policies, we are able to identify program characteristics that significantly affect participation rates. In particular, we find that participation rates are significantly negatively influenced by limitations that some states place on the ability of Lifeline subscribers to utilize optional calling features such as three-way calling or call forwarding. We also find that program participation is positively influenced by the longevity of the individual state's Lifeline program. While no direct test of state-level advertising is feasible, this result is suggestive of an inter-temporal pattern of information dissemination that grows with program longevity. Because eligibility for the Lifeline service is conditional upon participation in other low-income public programs, we also find that: (1) the larger the number of "portals" (i.e., low income public programs that states identify as creating Lifeline eligibility), the higher is participation; and (2) higher financial benefits of these portal programs attract greater participation in Lifeline programs. These results suggest important linkages that may be exploited through coordination of low-income assistance programs. Finally, we test for, and find that variations in Lifeline benefits significantly influence participation rates.

Keywords: lifeline; participation; take rates

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Janice A. Hauge, Mark A. Jamison, and R. Todd Jewell
Information Economics and Policy, 2008, Volume 20, Number 2, Page 135
[2]
Janice A. Hauge, Eric P. Chiang, and Mark A. Jamison
Telecommunications Policy, 2009, Volume 33, Number 3-4, Page 129
[3]
Lynne Holt and Mary Galligan
Telecommunications Policy, 2013, Volume 37, Number 9, Page 773

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.