Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Friebel, Guido / Requate, Till / Tsui, Kevin / Wichardt, Philipp / Zulehner, Christine

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2013: 0.432
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.710

VolumeIssuePage

Measuring Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: The Importance of Cognitive Consistency

Olof Johansson-Stenman1 / Henrik Svedsäter2

1University of Gothenburg,

2London Business School,

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. Volume 8, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.1898, September 2008

Publication History

Published Online:
2008-09-18

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Abstract

A choice experiment eliciting environmental values with both real and hypothetical trade-offs is set up in order to test for hypothetical bias. A larger hypothetical bias was found in a between-subject than in a within-subject design, using otherwise identical scenarios, which can explain previous diverging results in the literature. We argue that people strive for consistency between their attitudes and behaviors, leading them to act in ways that correspond with their prior hypothetical statements. People hence seem to prefer to do what they say they would do, although this may not always reflect their true preferences regarding the good being valued.

Keywords: stated-preference methods; choice experiment; hypothetical bias; internal consistency; non-market valuation

Supplementary Article Materials

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.