Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
October 2011
ISSN:
1935-1682
DOI:
10.2202/1935-1682.2707

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 345.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 473.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 414.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 568.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Friebel, Guido / Ludwig, Sandra / Requate, Till / Schneider, Hilmar / Tsui, Kevin / Wichardt, Philipp

2 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.550

 

 

VolumeIssuePage

Labor Market Effects of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill

John Hore1 / William J. Carrington2

1Navigant Economics, john.hore@naviganteconomics.com

2Congressional Budget Office, william.carrington@cbo.gov

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2707, October 2011

Publication History:
Published Online:
2011-10-03

Abstract

We study the labor market effects of the 1989 Exxon Valdez Oil Spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska, which was the largest U.S. oceanic oil spill prior to the 2010 Gulf Oil Spill. We find that employment and average earnings increased in 1989 when the cleanup effort was largest and there appears to have been little, if any, adverse effect on average labor market opportunities in later years. Increased wages elicited increased labor supply in the form of both in-migration of workers and increased weekly hours. While the labor market effects of the spill were largely beneficial, there is some evidence that the effects upon self-employed fishing boat owners in the region may have been more heterogeneous, with some owners signing lucrative cleanup contracts with Exxon and its agents while others did not. The existence of these positive labor effects does not address the significant environmental, psychological and social costs imposed on the region and on the communities whose livelihood and organization were affected by the spill.

Keywords: Exxon Valdez; labor market; oil spill

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.