Private Schools and Residential Choices: Accessibility, Mobility, and Welfare : The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Jürges, Hendrik / Ludwig, Sandra

Ed. by Auriol , Emmanuelle / Brunner, Johann / Fleck, Robert / Mendola, Mariapia / Requate, Till / Zulehner, Christine / Schirle, Tammy


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.825

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.501
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.418
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.455

Online
ISSN
1935-1682
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

Private Schools and Residential Choices: Accessibility, Mobility, and Welfare

Eric A Hanushek1 / Sinan Sarpça2 / Kuzey Yilmaz3

1Stanford University,

2Koç University,

3Koç University,

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. Volume 11, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1935-1682, DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2746, August 2011

Publication History

Published Online:
2011-08-02

Abstract

Private schools free households from a strict link between residential location decisions and the tax-school quality bundles they consume. In order to study the impact of private schools on educational outcomes, we develop a general equilibrium model that simultaneously incorporates locational choice built on access and locational choice built on tax-school quality attributes of jurisdictions. We conclude that private school choice enhances the welfare of all households—both those attending private schools and those attending public schools—while also working to reduce the amount of housing and school segregation in equilibrium. Investigation of alternative school policies indicates that greater choice, including using targeted school vouchers, can improve welfare and achievement. Finally, we demonstrate how the fiscal burden arising from some households paying less taxes than they consume in public services varies significantly with the structure of school choice options.

Keywords: Tiebout model; sorting; school choice; urban location model; school district consolidation; vouchers

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Charles Ka Yui Leung, Sinan Sarpça, and Kuzey Yilmaz
Journal of Housing Economics, 2012, Volume 21, Number 4, Page 310
[2]
Ahmet Alkan, Nejat Anbarci, and Sinan Sarpça
Economics Letters, 2012, Volume 117, Number 2, Page 500

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.