The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics
Editor-in-Chief: Abraham, Arpad / Cavalcanti, Tiago
Ed. by Carceles-Poveda , Eva / Debortoli, Davide / Kambourov, Gueorgui / Lambertini, Luisa / Pavoni, Nicola / Ruhl, Kim
2 Issues per year
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2013: 0.293
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.453
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.731
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.934
Volume 15 (2015)
Volume 14 (2014)
Volume 13 (2013)
Volume 12 (2012)
Volume 11 (2011)
Volume 10 (2010)
Volume 9 (2009)
Volume 8 (2008)
Volume 7 (2007)
Volume 5 (2005)
Volume 4 (2004)
Volume 3 (2003)
Volume 2 (2002)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Comparing Wealth Effects: The Stock Market versus the Housing Market by Case, Karl E./ Quigley, John M. and Shiller, Robert J.
- Monetary and Macroprudential Policy Rules in a Model with House Price Booms by Kannan, Prakash/ Rabanal, Pau and Scott, Alasdair M.
- The Effects of the Great Recession on Central Bank Doctrine and Practice by Bernanke, Ben S.
- How have global shocks impacted the real effective exchange rates of individual euro area countries since the euro’s creation? by Bussiere, Matthieu/ Chudik, Alexander and Mehl, Arnaud
The Revival of Scale Effects
Citation Information: Topics in Macroeconomics. Volume 2, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1534-5998, DOI: 10.2202/1534-5998.1058, September 2002
- Published Online:
Scale effects in growth, positive effects of the population size on per capita output growth, have been rejected by cross-country regressions. This paper, however, finds that long-run time-series data supports the effects. Moreover, although scale effects in growth seem to be inconsistent with the fact that a substantial increase in the R&D labor in the postwar United States did not raise its growth rate, the theoretical part of this paper proposes costly international knowledge diffusion as its possible reason, suggesting that growth did not improve most likely because additional R&D labor was devoted to knowledge diffusion, rather than innovation. Calibration analysis shows that the key variables predicted by the model are not very different from their actual values in the postwar United States.