In this paper, we analyze successive oligopolies where downstream firms share the same decreasing returns technology of the Cobb-Douglas type. We stress the differences between the conclusions obtained under this assumption and those resulting from the traditional literature in which output firms use a constant returns technology. It is shown that when firms use a decreasing returns technology, (i) the profit of a downstream firm can decrease when the upstream market is more competitive; (ii) the input price does not tend to the corresponding marginal cost when the number of firms in both markets tends to infinite; and (iii) double marginalization is lower. Finally, the effects of mergers are revisited to highlight the role played by the technology of output firms.

Ed. by Cervellati, Matteo / Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Schipper, Burkhard
1 Issue per year
Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.490
Issues
Volume 12 (2012)
Volume 11 (2011)
Volume 10 (2010)
Volume 9 (2009)
Volume 8 (2008)
Volume 7 (2007)
Volume 6 (2006)
Volume 5 (2005)
Volume 4 (2004)
Volume 3 (2003)
Volume 2 (2002)
Volume 1 (2001)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Seller Cheap Talk in Almost Common Value Auction by LI, Daniel Zhiyun
- Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding by Ausubel, Lawrence M and Milgrom, Paul R
- Strategic Effects of Renegotiation-Proof Contracts by Gerratana, Emanuele and Koçkesen, Levent
- Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition by Farrell, Joseph and Shapiro, Carl
- An Experimental Comparison of Sequential First- and Second-Price Auctions with Synergies by Leufkens, Kasper/ Peeters, Ronald and Vorsatz, Marc
Successive Oligopolies and Decreasing Returns
Skerdilajda Zanaj1
1University of Luxembourg, skerdilajda.zanaj@uni.lu
Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics. Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, DOI: 10.2202/1935-1704.1595, November 2010
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2010-11-09
Keywords: successive oligopolies; downstream technology; mergers


















Comments (0)