Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
August 2010
ISSN:
1935-1704
DOI:
10.2202/1935-1704.1612

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 234.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 315.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 281.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 378.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Cervellati, Matteo / Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Schipper, Burkhard

1 Issue per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.490

Communication Breakdown: Consultation or Delegation from an Expert with Uncertain Bias

Anthony Rush1 / Vladimir Smirnov2 / Andrew Wait3

1Reserve Bank of Australia, rusha@rba.gov.au

2University of Sydney, v.smirnov@econ.usyd.edu.au

3University of Sydney, a.wait@econ.usyd.edu.au

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics. Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, DOI: 10.2202/1935-1704.1612, August 2010

Publication History:
Published Online:
2010-08-04

When communicating with an uninformed decision maker, the motives behind an expert's message are often unclear. To explore this and investigate its impact on organizational design, we extend the cheap-talk model of Crawford and Sobel (1982) to allow for uncertainty over the expert's bias. We find that, in contrast to Dessein (2002), it is possible that the decision maker prefers communication to delegation; that is, it can be optimal for a decision maker to retain control and to solicit advice from the expert.

Keywords: delegation; communication; uncertainty; bias; cheap-talk model

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.