Linear Demand Systems are Inconsistent with Discrete Choice : The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics

Editor-in-Chief: Schipper, Burkhard

Ed. by Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Wenzelburger, Jan


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.412
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.471

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.458
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.553
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.329

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2015: 0.16

Online
ISSN
1935-1704
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Linear Demand Systems are Inconsistent with Discrete Choice

Sonia Jaffe1 / E. Glen Weyl2

1Harvard University,

2Harvard University,

Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics. Volume 10, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, DOI: 10.2202/1935-1704.1729, December 2010

Publication History

Published Online:
2010-12-21

We show that with more than two options, a discrete choice model cannot generate linear demand. In doing so, we demonstrate a prediction of such discrete choice models that is falsifiable based on local second-order properties of demand.

Keywords: linear demand; discrete choice

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Mark Armstrong and John Vickers
Journal of Economic Theory, 2015, Volume 158, Page 293

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.