We study strategy-proof decision rules in the variant of the canonical public good model proposed by Borgers and Postl (2009). In this setup, we fully characterize the set of budget-balanced strategy-proof deterministic mechanisms, which are simple threshold rules. For smooth probabilistic mechanisms, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for dominant strategy implementation. When allowing for discontinuities in the mechanism, our necessary condition remains valid, but additional conditions must hold for sufficiency. We also show that, among ex post efficient decision rules, only dictatorial ones are strategy-proof. While familiar in spirit, this result is not the consequence of any known result in the literature.

Ed. by Cervellati, Matteo / Fong, Yuk-fai / Peeters, Ronald / Puzzello , Daniela / Rivas, Javier / Schipper, Burkhard
1 Issue per year
Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.490
Issues
Volume 12 (2012)
Volume 11 (2011)
Volume 10 (2010)
Volume 9 (2009)
Volume 8 (2008)
Volume 7 (2007)
Volume 6 (2006)
Volume 5 (2005)
Volume 4 (2004)
Volume 3 (2003)
Volume 2 (2002)
Volume 1 (2001)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Seller Cheap Talk in Almost Common Value Auction by LI, Daniel Zhiyun
- Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding by Ausubel, Lawrence M and Milgrom, Paul R
- Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition by Farrell, Joseph and Shapiro, Carl
- Strategic Effects of Renegotiation-Proof Contracts by Gerratana, Emanuele and Koçkesen, Levent
- An Experimental Comparison of Sequential First- and Second-Price Auctions with Synergies by Leufkens, Kasper/ Peeters, Ronald and Vorsatz, Marc
Strategy-Proof Compromises
Peter Postl1
1University of Birmingham, p.postl@bham.ac.uk
Citation Information: The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics. Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1935-1704, DOI: 10.2202/1935-1704.1684, October 2011
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2011-10-07
Keywords: compromise; public good provision; dominant strategy implementation; strategy-proof; dictatorship


















Comments (0)