Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Biologia

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2013: 0.696
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.751

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.306
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.555

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Hybridization between Cottus gobio and Cottus poecilopus in the Odra River drainage basin (Czech Republic)

1Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic

2University of Ostrava

© 2012 Versita Warsaw. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Citation Information: Biologia. Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 788–795, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: 10.2478/s11756-012-0071-4, June 2012

Publication History

Published Online:
2012-06-30

Abstract

Comparisons of morphology, nuclear gene sequencing and microsatellites were used to identify 19 hybrids between the related species Cottus poecilopus and Cottus gobio in three rivers of the Odra River drainage basin. All hybrids were the results of backcrossing and no F1 generation hybrid was found. The resulting progeny are fertile and continue in backcrossing with parental conspecifics. A high representation of backcrosses appears to indicate a lack of reproduction barriers within the hybridization process. It was impossible to differentiate individual back-cross categories on the sole basis of six loci. Mitochondrial haplotypes indicate that this is not a one-way process. In our study, hybridization was asymmetrical in favour of Cottus poecilopus.

Keywords: bullheads; hybrid zones; microsatellites; S7 nuclear gene

  • [1] Allendorf F.W., Leary R.F. & Spruell P. 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16(11): 613–622. DOI:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X [CrossRef]

  • [2] Alves M.J., Coelho M.M. & Collares-Pereira M.J. 1997. The Rutilus alburnoides complex (Cyprinidae): evidence for hybrid origin. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Research 35(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1997.tb00398.x [CrossRef]

  • [3] Andreasson S. 1968. Hybridisering mellan stensimpa och bergsimpa. Fauna och Flora 63(6): 242–251.

  • [4] Andreasson S. 1972. Distribution of Cottus poecilopus Heckel and Cottus gobio (L.) (Pisces) in Scandinavia. Zoologica Scripta 1(2): 69–78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1972.tb00570.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1972.tb00570.x [CrossRef]

  • [5] Anderson E.C. & Thomson E.A. 2002. A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160(3): 1217–1299. PMID: 1462008

  • [6] Arnold M.L. & Hodges S.A. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or infit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10(2): 67–71. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88979-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88979-X [CrossRef]

  • [7] Asmussen M.A. & Basten Ch.J. 1996. Constraints and normalized measures for cytonuclear disequilibria. Heredity 76(Pt 3): 207–214. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1996.33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.33 [CrossRef]

  • [8] Basten Ch.J. & Asmussen M.A. 1997. The exact test for cytonuclear disequilibria. Genetics 146(3): 1165–1171. PMID: 9215917

  • [9] Belkhir K., Borsa P., Chikhi L., Raufaste N. & Bonhomme F. 1996–2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France). http://www.eeb.ucla.edu/Faculty/Barber/Software.htm

  • [10] Berrebi P., Cattaneo-Berrebi G. & Le Brun N. 1993. Natural hybridization of two species of tetraploid barbels: Barbus meridionalis and Barbus barbus (Osteichthyes, Cyprinidae) in southern France. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48(4): 319–333. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb02094.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb02094.x [CrossRef]

  • [11] Boecklen W.J. & Howard D.J. 1997. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones: numbers of markers and power of resolution. Ecology 78(8): 2611–2616. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2611: GAOHZN]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2611:GAOHZN]2.0.CO;2 [CrossRef]

  • [12] Chow S. & Hazama K. 1998. Universal PCR primers for S7 ribosomal protein gene introns in fish. Mol. Ecol. 7(9): 1255–1256.

  • [13] Coombs J.A., Letcher B.H. & Nislow K.H. 2008. CREATE: a software to create input files from diploid genotypic data for 52 genetic software programs. Mol. Ecol. Resources 8(3): 578–580. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.02036.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.02036.x [Web of Science]

  • [14] Crespin L. & Berrebi P. 1999. Asymmetrical introgression in freshwater fish hybrid zone as revealed by a morphological index of hybridization. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 67(1): 57–72. DOI: 10.1006/bijl.1998.0287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01929.x [CrossRef]

  • [15] Čihař J. 1969. Taxonomical and ecological notes on Cottus gobio Linnaeus, 1758, and Cottus poecilopus Heckel, 1836 (Osteichthyes: Cotidae). Acta Soc. Zool. Bohemoslov. 33(2): 102–110.

  • [16] Demandt M.H. & Bergek S. 2009. Identification of cyprinid hybrids by using geometric morphometrics and microsatellites. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 25(6): 695–701. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01329.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01329.x [CrossRef] [Web of Science]

  • [17] Dudu A., Suciu R., Paraschiv M., Georgescu S.E., Costache M. & Berrebi P. 2011. Nuclear markers of Danube sturgeons hybridization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12(10): 6796–6809. DOI: 10.3390/ijms12106796 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms12106796 [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • [18] Englbrecht C.C., Largiader C.R., Hänfling B. & Tautzs D. 1999. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic loci in the European bullhead Cottus gobio L. (Osteichthyes) and their applicability to related taxa. Mol. Ecol. 8(11): 1966–1969. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00778-6.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00778-6.x [CrossRef]

  • [19] Excoffier L. & Lischer H.E.L. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resources 10(3): 564–567. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x [CrossRef] [Web of Science]

  • [20] Freyhof J., Lieckfeldt D., Pitra Ch. & Ludwig A. 2005. Molecules and morphology: Evidence for introgression of mitochondrial DNA in Dalmatian cyprinids. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37(2): 347–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.018 [CrossRef]

  • [21] Goudet J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995)

  • [22] Hänfling B., Bolton P., Harley M. & Carvalho G. 2005. A molecular approach to detect hybridisation between crucian carp (Carassius carassius) and nonindigenous carp species (Carassius spp. and Cyprinus carpio). Freshwater Biol. 50(3): 403–417. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01330.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01330.x [CrossRef]

  • [23] Iguchi K., Yamamoto G., Matsubara N. & Nishida N. 2003. Morphological and genetic analysis of fish of a Carassius complex (Cyprinidae) in Lake Kasumigaura with reference to the taxonomic status of two all-female triploid morphs. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 79(2): 351–357. DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00196.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00196.x [CrossRef]

  • [24] Lajbner Z., ŠlechtovŠlechta V., Švátora M., Berrebi P. & Kotlík P. 2009. Rare and asymmetrical hybridization of the endemic Barbus carpathicus with its widespread congener Barbus barbus. J. Fish. Biol. 74(2): 418–436. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02098.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02098.x [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • [25] Lusk S., Bartoňová E., Lusková V., Lojkásek B. & Koščo J. 2008. Vranka pruhoploutvá Cottus poecilopus - rozšíření a genetická diverzita v povodí řek Morava, Odra (Česk Hornád (Slovensko) [Siberian sculpin Cottus poecilopus: distribution and genetic diversity in the Morava, Odra (Czech Republic), and Hornád (Slovakia) drainage areas], pp. 67–80. In: Lusk S. & Lusková V. (eds), Biodiverzita ichtyofauny Česk, ústav biologie obratlovců AV ČR, v.v.i., Brno. ISBN: 978-80-87189-01-6

  • [26] Lusk S., Halačka K. & Lusková V. 1998. The effect of an extreme flood on the fish communities in the upper reaches of the Tichá Orlice River (The Labe drainage basin). Czech J. Anim. Sci. 43: 531–536.

  • [27] Lusk S., Lusková V., Bartoňová E. & Havelka J. 2011. Ryby a mihule v horní části řeky Svratky [Fishes and lamprey in upper part of Svratka River], pp. 98–108. In: Lusk S. & Lusková V. (eds), Biodiverzita ichtyofauny Česk of Fishes in the Czech Republic], ústav biologie obratlovců AV ČR, v.v.i., Brno. ISBN: 978-80-87189-08-5.

  • [28] Lojkásek B., Lusk S., Halačka K., Lusková V. & Drozd P. 2005. The impact of the extreme floods in July 1997 on the ichthyocenosis of the Oder catchment area (Czech Republic). Hydrobiologia 548(1): 11–22. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-3644-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-3644-1 [CrossRef]

  • [29] Mahen J. 1927. Naše vranky [Our bullheads]. Rybářský věstník 7: 100–101, 116–117, 132–133.

  • [30] Müller K. 1960. Beitrag zur Systematik und Verbreitung von Cottus gobio L. und Cottus poecilopus. Kungl. Fysiografiska Sällskapets I Lund Förhandlingar 30(8): 57–66.

  • [31] Nesbo C.L., Arab M.O. & Jakobsen K.S. 1998. Heteroplasmy, length and sequence variation in the mtDNA control regions of three percid fish species (Perca fluviatilis, Acerina cernua, Stizostedion lucioperca). Genetics 148(4): 1907–1919.

  • [32] Nolte A.W., Freyhof J. & Tautz D. 2006. When invader meets locally adapted types: rapid moulding of hybrid zones between sculpins (Cottus, Pisces) in the Rhine system. Mol. Ecol. 15(7): 1983–1993. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02906.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02906.x [CrossRef]

  • [33] Nolte A.W., Gompert Z. & Buerkle C.A. 2009. Variable patterns in two sculpin hybrid zones suggest that genomic isolation differs among populations. Mol. Ecol. 18(12): 2615–2627. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04208.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04208.x [CrossRef] [Web of Science]

  • [34] Papoušek I., Vetešník L., Halačka K., Lusková V., Humpl M. & Mendel J. 2008. Identification of natural hybrids of gibel carp Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch) and crucian carp Carassius carassius (L.) from lower Dyje River floodplain (Czech Republic). J. Fish Biol. 72(5): 1230–1235. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01783.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01783.x [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • [35] Peakall R. & Smouse P.E. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6(1): 288–295. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x [CrossRef]

  • [36] Pitts C.S., Jordan D.R., Cowx I.G. & Jones N.V. 1997. Controlled breeding studies to verify the identity of roach and common bream hybrids from a natural population. J. Fish Biol. 51(4): 686–696. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01991.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01991.x [CrossRef]

  • [37] Pritchard J.K., Stephens M. & Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2): 945–959. PMID: 10835412 [Web of Science]

  • [38] Sambrook J., Fritsch E. & Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 654 pp. ISBN-10: 0879693096, ISBN-13: 978-0879693091

  • [39] Schwartz F.J. 2001. Freshwater and marine fish family hybrids: A worldwide changing scene revealed by the scientific literature. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 117(1): 62–65.

  • [40] Seehausen O., Takimoto G., Roy D. & Jokela J. 2008. Speciation reversal and biodiversity dynamics with hybridization in changing enviroments. Mol. Ecol. 17(1): 30–44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03529.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03529.x [CrossRef] [Web of Science]

  • [41] Starmach J. 1965. Koppen in der Karpathenflüssen. II. Antreten und Charakteristik der Buntflossenkoppe (Cottus poecilopus Heckel) und weissflossigen Koppe (Cottus gobio L.) in Raba Flussgebiet. Acta Hydrobiol. 7: 109–140.

  • [42] Sweigart A. 2009. Sculpin hybrid zones: natural laboratories for the early stages of speciation. Mol. Ecol. 18(12): 2547–2548. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04209.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04209.x [Web of Science] [CrossRef]

  • [43] Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M. & Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28(10): 2731–2739. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121 [CrossRef] [Web of Science]

  • [44] Turner G.F. 1999. What is a species? Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 9(4): 281–297. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008903228512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008903228512 [CrossRef]

  • [45] Van Oosterhout C., Hutchinson W.F., Wills D.P.M. & Shipley P. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4(3): 535–538. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x [CrossRef]

  • [46] Wyatt P.M.W., Pitts C.S. & Butlin R.K. 2006. A molecular approach to detect hybridization between bream Abramis brama, roach Rutilus rutilus and rudd Scardinius erythropthalmus. J. Fish Biol. 69(Suppl. A): 52–71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01104.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01104.x [CrossRef]

  • [47] Zelinka M. 1951. K zeměpisnému rozšíření vranek na Moravě [To geographic distribution of sculpins in Moravia]. Akvaristické listy 23(3): 30–32.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.