Environmental factors affecting the densities of owls in Polish farmland during 1980–2005 : Biologia Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Biologia


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.719
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.740

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.322
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.510
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.786

149,00 € / $224.00 / £112.00*

Online
ISSN
1336-9563
See all formats and pricing



Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

Environmental factors affecting the densities of owls in Polish farmland during 1980–2005

1Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679, Warsaw, Poland

2Centre for Ecological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Dziekanów L. near Warsaw, 05-092, Łomianki, Poland

3Faculty of Biology and Environmental Studies, UKSW, Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938, Warsaw, Poland

© 2012 Slovak Academy of Sciences. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Citation Information: Biologia. Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages 1204–1210, ISSN (Online) 1336-9563, ISSN (Print) 0006-3088, DOI: 10.2478/s11756-012-0114-x, October 2012

Publication History

Published Online:
2012-10-19

Abstract

During the last decades, farmland habitats in central European countries have changed significantly, seriously affecting populations of many farmland bird species. We compiled available published data on densities of three owl species, Athene noctua, Asio otus and Strix aluco collected in the Polish farmland. All results of censuses based on the playback method conducted between 1980–2005 were included in the analysis. The proportions of grassland, fields, built-up land and forest at each studied plot were estimated and used as predictors in additive models. Proportions of main land use types, extracted with the principal component analysis, explained much of the variation found in owl densities, although some of the relationships were nonlinear. In general, owl densities were found to be affected positively by a high percentage of grasslands and built-up land, and negatively by the amount of fields and forests. Little owl densities showed a significant negative trend over the study period. It seems that high prey availability is an important factor accounting for the positive relationship between grassland proportion and owl density. The significant decrease in grassland areas and increase in forest coverage that were recently recorded in Poland may thus negatively affect populations of the three owl species studied here.

Keywords: little owl; long-eared owl; tawny owl; grassland; habitat preferences

  • [1] Aschwanden J., Birrer S. & Jenni L. 2005. Are ecological compensation areas attractive hunting sites for common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) and long-eared owls (Asio otus)? J. Ornithol. 146(3): 279–286. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-005-0090-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-005-0090-9 [CrossRef]

  • [2] Atkinson P.W., Fuller R.J., Vickery J.A., Conway G.J., Tallowin J.R.B., Smith R.E.N., Haysom K.A., Ings T.C., Asteraki E.J. & Brown V.K. 2005. Influence of agricultural management, sward structure and food resources on grassland field use by birds in lowland England. J. Appl. Ecol. 42(5): 932–942. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01070.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01070.x [CrossRef]

  • [3] Bacia D. 1997. Pokarm i preferencje środowiskowe pójdźki (Athene noctua Scop.) w krajobrazie rolniczym [Food and habitat preferences of little owl (Athene noctua Scop.) in an agricultural area]. MSc Thesis, Warsaw University, 66 pp.

  • [4] Baur B., Cremene C., Groza G., Rakosy L., Schileyko A.A., Baur A., Stoll P. & Erhardt A. 2006. Effects of abandonment of subalpine hay meadows on plant and invertebrate diversity in Transylvania, Romania. Biol. Conserv. 132(2): 261–273. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.018 [CrossRef]

  • [5] Biedermann R., Achtziger R., Nickel H. & Stewart A.J.A. 2005. Conservation of grassland leafhoppers: a brief review. J. Insect Conserv. 9(4): 229–243. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-005-0531-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10841-005-0531-z [CrossRef]

  • [6] Butet A. & Leroux A.B.A. 2001. Effects of agriculture development on vole dynamics and conservation of Montagu’s harrier in western French wetlands. Biol. Conserv. 100(3): 289–295. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00033-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00033-7 [CrossRef]

  • [7] Cabeza M., Arponen A. & van Teeffelen A. 2008. Top predators: hot or not? A call for systematic assessment of biodiversity surrogates. J. Appl. Ecol. 45(3): 976–980. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01364.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01364.x [CrossRef]

  • [8] Chylarecki P. & Jawińska D. 2007. Monitoring Pospolitych Ptaków Legowych: Raport z lat 2005–2006 [Common Breeding Bird Monitoring in Poland: Annual report 2005–2006]. Ogolnopolskie Towarzystwo Ochrony Ptakow OTOP [Polish Society for the Protection of Birds], Warsaw, 43 pp. ISBN: 83-89830-20-5

  • [9] Cramp S. & Simmons K. 1980. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. II. Hawks to Bustards. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 695 pp. ISBN: 978-0-19-857505-4, ISBN: 019857505X

  • [10] Diaz M., Carbonell R., Santos T. & Telleria J.L. 1998. Breeding bird communities in pine plantations of the Spanish plateaux: biogeography, landscape and vegetations effects. J. Appl. Ecol. 35(4): 562–574. DOI: 10.1046/j.13652664.1998.3540562.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.3540562.x [CrossRef]

  • [11] Domaszewicz A., Jabłoński P. & Lewartowski Z. (eds) 1984. Metody liczenia sów. Biuletyn Kołla Naukowego Biologów Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, 43 pp.

  • [12] Dombrowski A., Fronczak J., Kowalski M. & Lippoman T. 1991. Liczebność i preferencje środowiskowe sów Strigiformes na terenach rolniczych Niziny Mazowieckiej. Acta Ornithol. 26: 39–53.

  • [13] Dombrowski A., Kot H., Goławski A. & Kasprzykowski Z. 2004. Zmiany liczebności sów Strigiformes w krajobrazie rolniczym Wysoczyzny Siedleckiej w latach 1984–1985 i 2002 [Fluctuations in the numbers of owls Strigiformes breeding in the agricultural landscape of the Wysoczyzna Siedlecka region in 1984–1985 and 2002]. Not. Ornitol. 45: 41–44.

  • [14] Donald P.F., Sanderson F.J., Burfield I.J. & van Bommel F.P.J. 2006. Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agriculture intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116(3–4): 189–196. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.007 [CrossRef]

  • [15] Fabriciusová V., Kaňuch P & Krištín A. 2011. Response of Orthoptera assemblages to management of montane grasslands in the Western Carpathians. Biologia 66(6): 1127–1133 DOI: 10.2478/s11756-011-0115-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0115-1 [CrossRef]

  • [16] Fronczak J. & Dombrowski A. 1991. Sowy Strigiformes w krajobrazie rolniczym i leśnym Niziny Poludniowopodlaskiej [Owls Strigiformes in an agricultural and forest landscape of South Podlasie Lowland (eastern Poland)]. Acta Ornithol. 26(1): 55–61.

  • [17] Fuller R.J., Norton L.R., Feber R.E., Johnson P.J., Chamberlain D.E., Joys A.C., Mathews F., Stuart R.C., Townsend M.C., Manley W.J., Wolfe M.S., Macdonald D.W. & Firbank L.G. 2005. Benefits of organic farming to biodiversity vary among taxa. Biol. Lett. 1(4): 431–434. DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0357 [CrossRef]

  • [18] Galeotti P. 2001. Strix aluco Tawny Owl. BWP Update 3(1): 43–77.

  • [19] Génot J.C. & Van Nieuwehuyse D. 2002. Athene noctua Little Owl. BWP Update 4: 35–63.

  • [20] Goławski A. & Dombrowski A. 2004. Importance of fallow land in habitat preferences of chosen breeding bird species in the agricultural landscape of Central Poland. Not. Ornitol. 45: 83–90.

  • [21] Goszczynski J. 1977. Connections between predatory birds and mammals and their prey. Acta Theriol. 22(30): 399–430. [CrossRef]

  • [22] Goszczyński J. 1981. Comparative analysis of food of owls in agrocenoses. Ekol. Pol. 23: 431–439.

  • [23] Goszczyński J., Jabłoński P., Lesiński G. & Romanowski J. 1993. Variation in diet of Tawny Owl Strix aluco L. along an urbanization gradient. Acta Ornithol. 27: 113–123.

  • [24] Hoste-Danyłow A., Romanowski J. & Żmihorski M. 2010. The effect of management type on epigeic invertebrates and foraging birds in extensively used grasslands of central Poland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 139(1–2): 129–133. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.009 [CrossRef]

  • [25] Jacob J. & Hampel N. 2003. Effects of farming practices of spatial behaviour of common voles. J. Ethol. 21(1): 45–50. DOI: 10.1007/s10164-002-0073-8 [CrossRef]

  • [26] Jermaczek A., Czwałga T. & Stańko R. 1990. Liczebność i rozmieszczenie sów w krajobrazie Ziemi Lubuskiej [Numbers and distribution of owls in the landscape of Ziemia Lubuska (western Poland)]. Przegl. Przyr. 1(3): 41–50.

  • [27] Jędrzejewski W., Jędrzejewska B., Szymura A. & Zub K. 1996. Tawny owl (Strix aluco) predation in a pristine deciduous forest (Białowieża National Park). J. Anim. Ecol. 65(1): 105–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/5704 [CrossRef]

  • [28] Kasprzykowski Z. & Goławski A. 2006. Habitat use of the Barn Owl Tyto alba and the Little Owl Athene noctua in centraleastern Poland. Biol. Lett. 43(1): 33–39.

  • [29] Korpimäki E. & Norrdahl K. 1989. Avian predation on mustelids in Europe 1: Occurrence and effects on body size variation and life traits. Oikos 55(2): 205–215. DOI: 10.2307/3565424 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3565424 [CrossRef]

  • [30] Korpimäki E. & Norrdahl K. 1991. Numerical and functional response of Kestrels, Short-eared Owls and Long-eared Owls to vole densities. Ecology 72(3): 814–826. DOI:10.2307/1940584 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940584 [CrossRef]

  • [31] Ławicki Ł., Wylegała P., Batycki A., Kajzer Z., Guentzel S., Jasiński M., Kruszyk R., Rubacha S. & Żmihorski M. 2011. Long-term decline of the grassland waders inWestern Poland. Vogelwelt 132(2): 101–108.

  • [32] Mackin-Rogalska R. & Nabagło L. 1990. Geographical variation in cyclic periodicity and synchrony in the common vole, Microtus arvalis. Oikos 59(3): 343–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545144 [CrossRef]

  • [33] Marchesi L. & Sergio F. 2005. Distribution, density, diet and productivity of the Scops Owl Otus scops in the Italian Alps. Ibis 147(1): 176–187. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00388.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00388.x [CrossRef]

  • [34] Mirski P. 2009. Selection of nesting and foraging habitat by the Lesser Spotted Eagle Aquila pomarina (Brehm) in the Knyszynska Forest (NE Poland). Pol. J. Ecol. 57(3): 581–587.

  • [35] Newton I. 2004. The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions. Ibis 146(4): 579–600. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474919X.2004.00375.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00375.x [CrossRef]

  • [36] Poulin R.G., Todd L.D., Dohms K.M., Brigham R.M. & Wellicome T.I. 2005. Factors associated with nest- and roostburrow selection by burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) on the Canadian prairies. Can. J. Zool. 83(10): 1373–1380. DOI: 10.1139/z05-134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z05-134 [CrossRef]

  • [37] R Development Core Team 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 409 pp. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/

  • [38] Romanowski J. 1988. Trophic Ecology of Asio otus (L.) and Athene noctua (Scop.) in the Suburbs of Warsaw. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 14: 223–234.

  • [39] Romanowski J. & Żmihorski M. 2008. Effect of season, weather and habitat on diet variation of a feeding-specialist: a case study of the long-eared owl, Asio otus in Central Poland. Folia Zool. 57(4): 411–419.

  • [40] Salek M. & Schropfer L. 2008. Population decline of the Little Owl (Athene noctua Scop.) in the Czech Republic. Pol. J. Ecol. 56(3): 527–534.

  • [41] Sergio F., Newton I., Marchesi L. & Pedrini P. 2006. Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 43(6): 1049–1055. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01218.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01218.x [CrossRef]

  • [42] Sheffield L.M., Crait J.R., Edge W.D. & Wang G. 2001. Response of American kestrels and gray-tailed voles to vegetation height and supplemental perches. Can. J. Zool. 79(3): 380–385. DOI:10.1139/z00-220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z00-220 [CrossRef]

  • [43] Skórka P., Lenda M. & Tryjanowski P. 2010. Invasive alien goldenrods negatively affect grassland bird communities in Eastern Europe. Biol. Conserv. 143(4): 856–861. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.030 [CrossRef]

  • [44] Stańko R. & Żegliński G. 2000. Liczebność pójdźki Athene noctua w dolinie Warty koło Głuchowa na Ziemi Lubuskiej [The number of Little Owl Athene noctua in the Warta River valley near Głuchowo, Lubusian Land]. Przegl. Przyr. 11(4): 100–102.

  • [45] Terborgh J. & Estes J.A. (eds) 2010. Trophic Cascades. Predators, Prey, and the Changing Dynamics of Nature. Island Press, 466 pp. ISBN-10: 1597264873, ISBN-13: 9781597264877

  • [46] Tome R. & Valkama J. 2001. Seasonal variation in the abundance and habitat use of Barn Owls Tyto alba on lowland farmland. Ornis Fennica 78(3): 109–118.

  • [47] Tomiałojć L. & Stawarczyk T. 2003. Awifauna Polski. Rozmieszczenie, liczebnosc i zmiany [The Avifauna of Poland. Distribution, numbers and trends]. Polish Society for Nature “pro Natura”, Wrocław, 427 pp. ISBN: 839196261X, 9788391962619

  • [48] Tryjanowski P., Hartel T., Baldi A., Szymanski P., Tobolka M., Herzon I., Golawski A., Konvicka M., Hromada M., Jerzak L., Kujawa K., Lenda M., Orlowski G., Panek M., Skórka P., Sparks T.H., Wuczyński A. & Żmihorski M. 2011. Conservation of farmland birds faces different challenges in Western and Central-Eastern Europe. Acta Ornithol. 46(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.3161/000164511X589857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3161/000164511X589857 [CrossRef]

  • [49] Verhulst J., Baldi A. & Klejin D. 2004. Relationship between land-use intensity and species richness and abundance of birds in Hungary. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 104(3): 465–473. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.043 [CrossRef]

  • [50] Wilson J., Morris A.J., Arroyo B.E., Clark S.C. & Bradbury R.B. 1999. A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 75(1–2): 13–30. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00064-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00064-X [CrossRef]

  • [51] Wood S.N. 2006. Generalized Additive Models. An Introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC. Boca Raton, 410 pp. ISBN-10: 1584884746, ISBN-13: 978-1584884743

  • [52] Zub K., Pugacewicz E., Jędrzejewska B. & Jędrzejewski W. 2010. Factors affecting habitat selection by breeding Lesser Spotted Eagles Aquila pomarina in northeastern Poland. Acta Ornithol. 45(1): 105–114. DOI: 10.3161/000164510X516155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3161/000164510X516155 [CrossRef]

  • [53] Zuberogoitia I. & Campos L.F. 1998. Censusing owls in large areas: a comparison between methods. Ardeola 45(1): 47–53. http://www.ardeola.org/files/370.pdf

  • [54] Żmihorski M. 2004. Liczebność pójdźki Athene noctua w krajobrazie rolniczym strefy podmiejskiej Warszawy [Number of the Little Owl Athene noctua inWarsaw suburban zone (Central Poland)]. Kulon 9(2): 203–205.

  • [55] Żmihorski M., Altenburg D., Romanowski J., Kowalski M. & Osojca G. 2006. Long term decline of the Little Owl in Central Poland. Pol. J. Ecol. 54(2): 321–324.

  • [56] Żmihorski M., Romanowski J. & Osojca G. 2009. Habitat preferences of a declining population of the little owl, Athene noctua in Central Poland. Folia Zool. 58(2): 207–215.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.