This article examines republican arguments for a basic income that turn on a right to exit the labour market. It gives criteria for the maintenance of republican freedom in markets, arguing that a right to exit or effective market power will guarantee republican freedom in markets. The article then considers whether a basic income is either sufficient or necessary to protect republican freedom both in labour markets and elsewhere. If a basic income is necessary to protect republican freedom in the labour market, I argue it is not sufficient to protect that freedom elsewhere. If citizens lack the means to maintain their republican freedom in the labour market, then there may be other spheres of life where they are vulnerable to subordination, whether or not they have a basic income. Some sociological evidence on cultural consumption patterns is presented.

Ed. by Haagh, Louise / Mulvale, James
2 Issues per year
Issues
Volume 7 (2012)
Volume 6 (2011)
Volume 5 (2010)
Volume 4 (2009)
Volume 2 (2007)
Most Downloaded Articles
- How Cash Transfers Promote the Case for Basic Income by Standing, Guy
- Reconsidering the Exploitation Objection to Basic Income by White, Stuart
- Review of Gijs van Donselaar, The Right to Exploit: Parasitism, Scarcity, Basic Income by Rey Pérez, Jose Luis
- Classical Liberalism and the Basic Income by Zwolinski, Matt
- A Lockean Argument for Basic Income by Moseley, Daniel D.
Basic Income, Republican Freedom, and Effective Market Power
Robert Jubb
1University of Oxford
Citation Information: Basic Income Studies. Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1932-0183, DOI: 10.2202/1932-0183.1102, November 2008
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2008-11-19
Keywords: Keywords – basic income; dependence; domination; markets; republicanism


















Comments (0)