Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
August 2007
ISSN:
1862-278X
DOI:
10.1515/BMT.2007.046

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 506.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 759.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 608.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 911.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Dössel, Olaf

Editorial Board Member: Augat, Peter / Bösiger, Peter / Gehring, Hartmut / Haueisen, Jens / Leonhardt, Steffen / Niederlag, Wolfgang / Radermacher, Klaus M. / Schmitz, Georg / Witte, Herbert / Boenick, Ulrich / Lenthe, Harry / Penzel, Thomas / Clasbrummel, Bernhard / Robitzki, Andrea A. / Scholz, Jörg / Snedeker, Jess G. / Wintermantel, Erich / Jockenhoevel, Stefan / Gilly, Hermann / Werner, Jürgen / Plank, Gernot / Stieglitz, Thomas

6 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.855
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.745
Rank 56 out of 72 in category Biomedical Engineering and rank 20 out of 23 in category Medical Informatics in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Objective assessment of the fusion frequency in functional electrical stimulation using the fast Fourier transform / Objektive Bestimmung der Fusionsfrequenz in der funktionellen Elektrostimulation mittels Fast Fourier Transformation

Stefan Sauermann1 / Dietmar Rafolt2 / Manfred Bijak3 / Ewald Unger4 / Hermann Lanmueller5 / Gerlinde Weigel6 / Werner Girsch7 / Winfried Mayr8

1Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Vienna, Austria

2Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Vienna, Austria

3Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Vienna, Austria

4Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Vienna, Austria

5Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Vienna, Austria

6Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Vienna, Austria

7Orthopädisches Spital Speising, Vienna, Austria

8Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Vienna, Austria

Corresponding author: Dr. Stefan Sauermann, Medical University of Vienna, Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43-1-404001991 Fax: +43-1-404003988

Citation Information: Biomedizinische Technik. Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 267–273, ISSN (Online) 1862278X, ISSN (Print) 00135585, DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2007.046, August 2007

Publication History:
Published Online:
2007-08-10

Abstract

In functional electrical stimulation (FES) the dynamics of tetanic muscle contractions is often described by the fusion frequency (FF), as determined by palpation: contractions elicited by stimulation frequencies above the FF appear smooth. To contribute to a more objective assessment of this important FES parameter, we have developed a dedicated signal analysis method based on fast Fourier transformation (FFT). The ripple to peak ratio (R rpFFT) – the relation between ripple amplitude and peak force value of a recorded tetanic muscle force in relation to the applied stimulation frequency – was determined automatically by analysing a 0.2-s interval in the steady state of a stimulation burst. The method was tested on simulated data and on force recordings from isolated tibialis anterior muscles of six rabbits. The results were compared to manual estimates. The robustness of the method was tested by adding noise and hum. Simulated noise at 100% of the ripple force increased R rpFFT by 4%. Hum at 20 Hz away from the stimulation frequency caused changes of less than 0.5%. The results of the automated analysis of recorded signals matched the manual estimates sufficiently well, especially for stimulation frequencies near or above FF. R rpFFT therefore seems suitable for automated, objective and robust assessment of the ripple and the FF of electrically stimulated muscle.

Keywords: dynamics; functional electrical stimulation; neuroprostheses; signal processing; tetanic contraction; Dynamik; funktionelle Elektrostimulation; Neuroprothese; Signalanalyse; tetanische Kontraktion

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.