Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
February 2010
ISSN:
1868-9027
DOI:
10.1515/BYZS.2009.004

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 314.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 472.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 377.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 567.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
VolumeIssuePage

Issues

The anonymous progymnasmata in John Doxapatres' Homiliae in Aphthonium

Craig A. Gibson1

1Iowa City

Citation Information: Byzantinische Zeitschrift. Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 83–94, ISSN (Online) 1864-449X, ISSN (Print) 0007-7704, DOI: 10.1515/BYZS.2009.004, February 2010

Publication History:
Published Online:
2010-02-23

Abstract

This article examines the anonymous progymnasmata in John Doxapatres' commentary on Aphthonius' Progymnasmata for evidence about their authorship, origin, and relations to other progymnasmata. These exercises include three chreias, a refutation and confirmation of the myth of Ganymedes, an encomium and invective of Agamemnon, a comparison of the grapevine and olive tree, and an ethopoeia on the deposition of the emperor Michael V Kalaphates. In addition to providing a formal rhetorical analysis of the exercises, the article offers further support for the view of R. F. Hock and E. N. O'Neil (The Chreia and Ancient Rhetoric: Classroom Exercises, 2002) that Doxapatres did not compose these exercises and that they all derive from a single collection. In an appendix, it argues that George Pachymeres, in his comparison of the olive tree and grapevine, used the anonymous comparison in Doxapatres and not the four parallel exercises by Ps.-Nicolaus.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.