Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Schlattmann, Peter / Whitfield, John B.

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2013: 2.955
Rank 5 out of 29 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2013 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.860
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.046

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Intermethod Variation in Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Measurement. Fresh Serum Pools and Control Materials Compared

Roberto Dominici / Enrico Cabrini / Giampaolo Cattozzo / Ferruccio Ceriotti / Vittorio Grazioli / Luisa Scapellato / Carlo Franzini

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 167–173, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2002.029, June 2005

Publication History

Published Online:
2005-06-01

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of using commercial control materials in a regional external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) for serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurement. We have assessed the commutability of 12 commercial control materials using five automated immunochemical systems. We compared the intermethod behavior of the materials with that of 12–14 patient serum pools. In a total of 48 comparisons (12 materials × 4 pairs of analytical systems), seven instances of noncommutability were apparent, as shown by normalized residuals falling outside the ±3 interval. The use of non-commutable materials generates two negative effects. In EQAS, the interlaboratory variation recorded is not representative of the variation expected in the assay of patient sera; in interlaboratory harmonization programs, recalibration with non-commutable materials increases, instead of decreasing, the interlaboratory variation. Both these effects were shown to occur in CEA measurement with the tested materials and systems. The materials planned to be used in our EQAS turned out to be commutable: this gave us the guarantee of measuring realistic interlaboratory variation values, although the check for commutability should be extended to all the analytical systems used by the participants in the scheme.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.