Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Schlattmann, Peter / Whitfield, John B.

12 Issues per year

40% increased IMPACT FACTOR 2012: 3.009
Rank 5 out of 31 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2012 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition



Assay Using Succinyldithiocholine as Substrate: The Method of Choice for the Measurement of Cholinesterase Catalytic Activity in Serum to Diagnose Succinyldicholine Sensitivity

Andrea Mosca / Roberto Bonora / Ferruccio Ceriotti / Carlo Franzini / Giuliana Lando / Maria Cristina Patrosso / Martina Zaninotto / Mauro Panteghini

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 317–322, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2003.051, June 2005

Publication History

Published Online:


No comparative information is available concerning the ability of various cholinesterase (ChE) methods to identify succinyldicholine-sensitive patients, purely on the basis of the enzyme activity recorded in serum. Here, we evaluated six different methods for the measurement of ChE activity; 131 subjects were subdivided according to ChE phenotype and, therefore, to succinyldicholine sensitivity. ChE phenotype was determined by measuring dibucaine and fluoride numbers. DNA analysis was also performed to confirm correlation between the phenotype classification used in the study and the ChE genotype. The tested methods were significantly different in their ability to discriminate between the subjects with and without succinyldicholine-sensitive phenotypes. The succinyldithiocholine/5,5′-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoate) (DTNB) method showed the highest accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve 0.97) followed by the propionylthiocholine/DTNB method (area under the ROC curve 0.94). On the other hand, the two methods using butyrylthiocholine as substrate and that employing benzoylcholine showed limited clinical utility in discriminating subjects at risk of prolonged apnea (area under the ROC curve ≤ 0.9). Using the succinyldithiocholine method, a value ≤ 23 U/l was approximately five times as likely to occur in a sensitive individual as in a normal one.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.