Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario
Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238
Analytical and diagnostic accuracy of the EliA™ automated enzyme fluoroimmunoassay for antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody detection
Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages 1161–1167, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.236, October 2004
- June 4, 2004
- August 20, 2004
Anti-proteinase 3 antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (PR3-ANCA) and anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies (MPO-ANCA) are considered important serological markers for several forms of idiopathic systemic vasculitis. The aim of the study was to verify the analytical and clinical performance of a new automated enzyme fluoroimmunoassay, the EliA system, for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA detection.
For this purpose the sera of 52 consecutive well-defined patients with a clinical diagnosis of Wegener’s granulomatosis (WG) (n = 29) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) (n = 23), and 70 controls suffering from connective tissue disease (25 systemic lupus erythematosus, 25 Sjögren’s syndrome and 20 rheumatoid arthritis) were tested for PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA with the EliA assay (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Freiburg, Germany). For comparison purposes, the same sera were also tested by indirect immunofluorescence, another direct immunometric assay (Varelisa, Pharmacia Diagnostics) and a capture PR3-ANCA (Wieslab AB, Lund, Sweden) method.
Both the EliA PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA assays showed between- and within-assay precision of < 10%. The dilution test gave straight lines (r2 = 0.998) for both antibody assays. The recovery ranged from 97.9% to 102.7% for PR3-ANCA and from 84.9% to 91.4% for MPO-ANCA.
There was a high positive correlation between the EliA and Varelisa methods for quantitative detection of MPO-ANCA levels (r2 = 0.949) and a lower correlation for PR3-ANCA (r2 = 0.771). Conversely, poor correlation was observed between EliA PR3-ANCA and capture PR3-ANCA (r2 = 0.537). The overall sensitivity and specificity of EliA PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA for the vasculitides considered in this study were 82.7% and 97.2%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 96.6% and a negative predictive value of 84.9%. Comparison of the results obtained with the indirect immunofluorescence, Varelisa and capture PR3-ANCA methods showed that the indirect immunofluorescence assay is the most sensitive method for the diagnosis of vasculitis (88.5%), but the least specific (94.3%); the EliA method is slightly more specific (97.2%) than the Varelisa method (95.7%), and also slightly more sensitive (82.7% vs. 80.8%). Capture PR3-ANCA proved to be the most sensitive method for detection of anti-proteinase 3 antibodies in WG (89.7% vs. 86.2% EliA and 79.3% Varelisa).
In conclusion, the EliA MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA methods provide good diagnostic accuracy and excellent analytical accuracy, which, in association with the practicality of the automated EliA system, make this method a useful tool for the diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitides.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.