Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

249,00 € / $374.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
June 2005
ISSN:
1437-4331
DOI:
10.1515/CCLM.2004.135

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 249.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 374.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1577.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2365.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1893.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2838.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Lippi, Giuseppe / Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Melichar, Bohuslav / Siest, Gérard / Whitfield, John B. / Abi Fadel, Marianne / Alvarez Menendez, Francisco V. / Azzazy, Hassan M.E. / Diamandis, Eleftherios P. / Eckardstein, Arnold / Favaloro, Emmanuel J. / Griesmacher, Andrea / Herrmann, Wolfgang / Hoffmann, Johannes J.M.L. / Hooijkaas, Herbert / Ichihara, Kiyoshi / Kaabachi, Naziha / Kim, Jeong-Ho / Korte, Wolfgang / Kroupis, Christos / Lai, Leslie Charles / Lam, Wai Kei Christopher / Marc, Janja / Miyoshi, Eiji / Özben, Tomris / Palicka, Vladimir / Panteghini, Mauro / Queralto, Jose M. / Scartezini, Marileia / Simundic, Ana-Maria / Tsongalis, Gregory J. / Wallemacq, Pierre E. / Yan, Shengkai / Young, Ian S. / Chiu, Rossa Wai Kwun / Ghosh, Debabrata / Kappelmayer, Janos / Lehmann, Sylvain / Sypniewska, Grazyna

12 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 2.150
Rank 10 out of 32 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Creation of a low-risk reference group and reference interval of fasting venous plasma glucose

Lone G. M. Jørgensen / Ivan Brandslund / Per Hyltoft Petersen / Marta Stahl / Niels de Fine Olivarius

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 42, Issue 7, Pages 817–823, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.135, June 2005

Publication History:
Published Online:
2005-06-01

Abstract

Reference intervals are recommended for naturally occurring quantities and required in the evaluation of new components in order to provide clinically useful information.

The aim of the present study is to present a method for selecting reference individuals for the determination of fasting venous plasma glucose (f-vPG) reference intervals and ways to determine if disease groups can share reference intervals with an ideal reference population.

Reference subjects were randomly selected, eligibility was judged according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Using the literature we selected risk indicators for diabetes mellitus (DM) and used these indicators to rule out high-risk individuals in order to obtain a reference distribution of f-vPG determined using individuals with low risk of DM. The distributions of f-vPG in the high-risk individuals was compared with that determined for the low-risk group. We then estimated the ability of the high-risk individuals to share the reference interval of the low risk individuals, and calculated the fraction that was outside this interval. Distributions were also investigated for linearity in the cumulated frequency rankit distribution of ln-values. The allowable difference between two reference limits could not exceed 0.375 times the population biological variation.

Most risk indicators were powerful predictors of high f-vPG values. Subgroups with these risk indicators should not be included in the homogeneous ln-normally distributed reference distribution. Distributions of f-vPG concentrations in individuals with risk factors were not homogeneous and varying percentages of individuals were outside the reference distribution, having f-vPG greater than 7.0 mmol/l.

We conclude that randomisation is only useful to recruit candidate reference subjects. To rule out subjects according to clinical risk factors for diabetes, it is necessary to identify a reference population with low risk of exhibiting increased f-vPG concentrations. This method may be used to validate a reference interval for a particular analyte with respect to an investigated disease, and to stratify risk factors of importance.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.