Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

249,00 € / $374.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
November 2006
ISSN:
1437-4331
DOI:
10.1515/CCLM.2006.251

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 249.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 374.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1577.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2365.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1893.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2838.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Lippi, Giuseppe / Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Melichar, Bohuslav / Siest, Gérard / Whitfield, John B. / Abi Fadel, Marianne / Alvarez Menendez, Francisco V. / Azzazy, Hassan M.E. / Diamandis, Eleftherios P. / Eckardstein, Arnold / Favaloro, Emmanuel J. / Griesmacher, Andrea / Herrmann, Wolfgang / Hoffmann, Johannes J.M.L. / Hooijkaas, Herbert / Ichihara, Kiyoshi / Kaabachi, Naziha / Kim, Jeong-Ho / Korte, Wolfgang / Kroupis, Christos / Lai, Leslie Charles / Lam, Wai Kei Christopher / Marc, Janja / Miyoshi, Eiji / Özben, Tomris / Palicka, Vladimir / Panteghini, Mauro / Queralto, Jose M. / Scartezini, Marileia / Simundic, Ana-Maria / Tsongalis, Gregory J. / Wallemacq, Pierre E. / Yan, Shengkai / Young, Ian S. / Chiu, Rossa Wai Kwun / Ghosh, Debabrata / Kappelmayer, Janos / Lehmann, Sylvain / Sypniewska, Grazyna

12 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 2.150
Rank 10 out of 32 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Comparability of five analytical systems for the determination of triiodothyronine, thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone

Qi Zhou1 / Shaonan Li2 / Xiaopeng Li3 / Wei Wang4 / Zhiguo Wang5

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Corresponding author: Qi Zhou, Beijing Hospital, National Center for Clinical Laboratories, 1 Da Hua Road, Beijing 100730, P.R. China Phone: +86-10-65273025, Fax: +86-10-65273025,

Citation Information: Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine. Volume 44, Issue 11, Pages 1363–1366, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.251, November 2006

Publication History:
Received:
May 11, 2006
Accepted:
September 5, 2006

Abstract

Background: The purpose of an external quality assessment (EQA) is to evaluate the analytical capability of clinical laboratories, identify differences among the laboratories and improve analytical quality. Our EQA results show that the rates of unsatisfactory performance for thyroid hormone tests were the highest in all of our EQA programs. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to investigate unsatisfactory results by comparing the analytical values of five routinely used analytical systems.

Methods: The Kruskal-Wallis and two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to identify analytical differences among and between analytical systems, respectively.

Results: The rates of significantly different results compared to the total number of analytical results were 81.1%, 64.5%, 93.3%, 50.0% and 56.7% for free triiodothyronine, total triiodothyronine, free thyroxine, total thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone, respectively.

Conclusions: Relatively large analytical differences between analytical systems were observed, especially when the analytical systems were used to measure free thyroid hormones.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:1363–6.

Keywords: analytical system; external quality assessment; non-parametric test; thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH); thyroxine (T4); triiodothyronine (T3)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.