Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R. / Tsongalis, Gregory J.

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 2.707
Rank 6 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.741
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 1.011
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 2.310

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Plasma, salivary and urinary cotinine in non-smoker Italian women exposed and unexposed to environmental tobacco smoking (SEASD study)

Marzia Simoni1 / Sandra Baldacci2 / Roberto Puntoni3 / Francesco Pistelli4 / Sara Farchi5 / Elena Lo Presti6 / Riccardo Pistelli7 / Giuseppe Corbo8 / Nerina Agabiti9 / Salvatore Basso10 / Gabriella Matteelli11 / Francesco Di Pede12 / Laura Carrozzi13 / Francesco Forastiere14 / Giovanni Viegi15

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

Corresponding author: Dr. Giovanni Viegi, Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica CNR, Via Trieste, 41, 56126 Pisa, Italy Phone: +39-050-502031/913632, Fax: +39-050-503596,

Citation Information: Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine. Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 632–638, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.098, May 2006

Publication History

Received:
November 14, 2005
Accepted:
February 6, 2006
Published Online:
2006-05-08

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare cotinine determinations in three biological fluids for assessing environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure in female non-smokers (n=1605) in Italy.

Methods: Information about ETS exposure at home, in the workplace, and in other places within the previous week was collected via questionnaire. Plasma, salivary and urinary cotinine levels were measured. Cotinine levels of ≥0.1 ng/mL for plasma, ≥0.2 ng/mL for saliva, and ≥0.5 ng/mL for urine were used to determine biochemical exposure.

Results: Median cotinine levels were significantly higher in exposed than in unexposed women (0.21 vs. 0.05 ng/mL in plasma, 0.80 vs. 0.41 ng/mL in saliva, and 9.74 vs. 5.30 ng/mL in urine). Self-reported ETS exposure was significantly related to biochemical exposure [odds ratio 2.99, (95% CI 2.40–3.72) for plasma; 1.90 (1.51–2.39) for saliva; and 2.67 (2.14–3.34) for urine]. Cotinine significantly increased with increasing exposure level, regardless of the exposure source. Among self-reported exposed subjects, higher percentages of cotinine level above the cut-off, i.e., indicating exposure, were found in saliva (76%) and urine (75%) than in plasma (52%).

Conclusions: In general, women correctly reported their ETS exposure status. Both non-invasive salivary and urinary cotinine determinations seem preferable in epidemiological studies, in view of their higher sensitivity, when compared to plasma cotinine.

Keywords: cotinine; environmental tobacco smoke; epidemiological study; questionnaires; self-reported exposure

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
[3]
John A Cunningham, Scott T Leatherdale, Peter L Selby, Rachel F Tyndale, Laurie Zawertailo, and Vladyslav Kushnir
BMC Public Health, 2011, Volume 11, Number 1, Page 741
[4]
Marzia Simoni, Sandra Baldacci, Roberto Puntoni, Francesco Pistelli, Sara Farchi, Elena Lo Presti, Riccardo Pistelli, Giuseppe Corbo, Nerina Agabiti, Salvatore Basso, Gabriella Matteelli, Francesco Di Pede, Laura Carrozzi, Francesco Forastiere, and Giovanni Viegi
Respiratory Medicine, 2007, Volume 101, Number 3, Page 531
[5]
Christian Heiss, Nicolas Amabile, Andrew C. Lee, Wendy May Real, Suzaynn F. Schick, David Lao, Maelene L. Wong, Sarah Jahn, Franca S. Angeli, Petros Minasi, Matthew L. Springer, S. Katharine Hammond, Stanton A. Glantz, William Grossman, John R. Balmes, and Yerem Yeghiazarians
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008, Volume 51, Number 18, Page 1760
[6]
Noel J. Aquilina, Juana Mari Delgado-Saborit, Claire Meddings, Stephen Baker, Roy M. Harrison, Peyton Jacob, Margaret Wilson, Lisa Yu, Minjiang Duan, and Neal L. Benowitz
Environment International, 2010, Volume 36, Number 7, Page 763
[7]
Craig S. Parzynski, Maria Jaszyna-Gasior, Frederick H. Franken, and Eric T. Moolchan
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 2008, Volume 89, Number 2, Page 145
[8]
Bee Lan Lee, Yanhong Gao, Ai Li New, Xu Wang, Woon-Puay Koh, and Choon Nam Ong
Analytical Methods, 2010, Volume 2, Number 7, Page 878
[9]
Hae Reung Lee, Hyeon-Keun Kim, Jang Suk Yoo, Kyu Nam Kim, Seon Yeong Lee, Sun Mi Yoo, Hyo Bin Kim, Bong Seong Kim, Soo Jong Hong, Ja Hyeung Kim, So Yeon Lee, Moon Woo Seong, and Do Hoon Lee
Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 2009, Volume 30, Number 1, Page 31
[10]
Sung Roul Kim, Heather Wipfli, Erika Avila-Tang, Jonathan M. Samet, and Patrick N. Breysse
Biomedical Chromatography, 2009, Volume 23, Number 3, Page 273

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.