Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

249,00 € / $374.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
June 2006
ISSN:
1437-4331
DOI:
10.1515/CCLM.2006.141

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 249.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 374.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1577.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2365.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1893.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2838.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Lippi, Giuseppe / Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Melichar, Bohuslav / Siest, Gérard / Whitfield, John B. / Abi Fadel, Marianne / Alvarez Menendez, Francisco V. / Azzazy, Hassan M.E. / Diamandis, Eleftherios P. / Eckardstein, Arnold / Favaloro, Emmanuel J. / Griesmacher, Andrea / Herrmann, Wolfgang / Hoffmann, Johannes J.M.L. / Hooijkaas, Herbert / Ichihara, Kiyoshi / Kaabachi, Naziha / Kim, Jeong-Ho / Korte, Wolfgang / Kroupis, Christos / Lai, Leslie Charles / Lam, Wai Kei Christopher / Marc, Janja / Miyoshi, Eiji / Özben, Tomris / Palicka, Vladimir / Panteghini, Mauro / Queralto, Jose M. / Scartezini, Marileia / Simundic, Ana-Maria / Tsongalis, Gregory J. / Wallemacq, Pierre E. / Yan, Shengkai / Young, Ian S. / Chiu, Rossa Wai Kwun / Ghosh, Debabrata / Kappelmayer, Janos / Lehmann, Sylvain / Sypniewska, Grazyna

12 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 2.150
Rank 10 out of 32 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Evaluation and quality assessment of glucose concentration measurement in blood by point-of-care testing devices

Michael Wehmeier1 / Burkhard T. Arndt2 / Gerhard Schumann3 / Wolf R. Külpmann4

1.

2.

3.

4.

Corresponding author: Dr. med. Dipl. biochem. Michael Wehmeier, Medical School Hannover, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany Phone: +49-511-532-2959, Fax: +49-511-532-5671,

Citation Information: Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine. Volume 44, Issue 7, Pages 888–893, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.141, June 2006

Publication History:
Received:
January 3, 2006
Accepted:
March 13, 2006
Published Online:
2006-06-16

Abstract

Background: In this study the analytical performance of eight glucose point-of-care testing (POCT) devices was evaluated. For this purpose, POCT measurement of glucose in heparinized blood collected from patients was paralleled by determination of the glucose concentration in the respective plasma by an analyzer (Hitachi 917) in the central laboratory, providing traceable results.

Methods: Trueness of POCT measurements was studied by comparing the plasma POCT values (mean of five measurements) with the results from the traceable measurement procedure (TMP).

Results: The percentage of POCT results within ±6% of the TMP mean value ranged from 24% to 50%, depending on the POCT device. Within the reference interval of plasma glucose (4.4–6.0 mmol/L), up to 67% of the POCT values were lower than 4.4 mmol/L, leading to a false diagnosis of hypoglycemia. In the hypoglycemic range (<4.4 mmol/L) up to 29% of the POCT analyses were false normoglycemic.

Conclusions: In conclusion, this study shows an insufficient trueness of glucose measurements by POCT devices in the normo- and hypoglycemic range. To improve quality assessment, sample splitting and simultaneous measurement of blood glucose concentration every 4 weeks by POCT devices and of plasma glucose concentration by a reliable TMP is recommended.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:888–93.

Keywords: comparative method; glucose; metrological traceability; point-of-care testing (POCT)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.