Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238

249,00 € / $374.00 / £187.00*

Online
ISSN
1437-4331
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

Perspective on the efficacy analysis of the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention trial

J. David Spence1

1Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

Corresponding author: Dr. David Spence, MD, FRPC, FAHA, Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Stroke Prevention and Atherosclerosis Research Centre, 1400 Western Road, London, ON, Canada N6G 2V2 Phone: +1-519-663-3113, Fax: +1-519-663-3018,

Citation Information: Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine. Volume 45, Issue 12, Pages 1582–1585, ISSN (Online) 14374331, ISSN (Print) 14346621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.325, December 2007

Publication History

Received:
2007-06-19
Accepted:
2007-07-24
Published Online:
2007-12-08

Abstract

Background: The pathogenesis of stroke is very different from that of myocardial infarction; most strokes are embolic, and as elevated plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) increases thrombosis, it increases the risk of cardioembolic strokes, particularly in atrial fibrillation, as well as the risk of deep vein thrombosis leading to paradoxical embolism, and elevated tHcy also increases strokes from cortical vein thrombosis.

Purpose and methods: The main study results of the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) trial showed no benefit of vitamin therapy for homocysteine lowering. However, there were a number of problems with the trial including: 1. We did not use a placebo control; we used a multiple vitamin containing low doses of folate and B6, and the recommended daily intake of B12; 2. Patients with low serum B12 levels in both arms of the trial received injections of B12; and 3. Folate fortification of grain products in North America coincided with the initiation of the trial. We therefore conducted a hypothesis-driven analysis of a subgroup of VISP from which patients who could not have responded to the study treatment were excluded, i.e., those with low or very high serum B12, and those with renal failure.

Results: In the remaining 2155 patients, there was a significant reduction of stroke, coronary events and death (p=0.049). When the participants were stratified according to the median entry level of B12 (313 pmol/L), it became apparent that serum B12 status was the key determinant of response, those with high serum B12 at entry who received high-dose vitamin had a 33% reduction of events compared to those with low B12 who received low-dose vitamins; the other two groups were intermediate (p=0.02 for survival free of stroke, coronary and death in the Kaplan-Meier analysis).

Discussion and conclusions: In this efficacy analysis, we found a significant reduction of vascular risk with vitamin therapy. Similarly, the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation 2 trial showed a 25% significant reduction of stroke with vitamin therapy (p=0.03). The authors thought this result was a chance finding, because they did not think that stroke and myocardial infarction would be biologically different; however, stroke and myocardial infarction have very different pathogenesis, so that conclusion is unwarranted. It seems likely that even if vitamin therapy does not significantly reduce coronary events, it will reduce the risk of stroke.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:1582–5.

Keywords: atherosclerosis; cardiovascular risk; homocysteine

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Arbor Clinical Nutrition Updates, 2010, Volume 318, Page 1
[2]
Kirk Hogan and Paul S. Myles
Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2013, Volume 116, Number 5, Page 955
[3]
Aron M. Troen, Tammy M. Scott, Kristen E. D’Anci, Denish Moorthy, Beverly Dobson, Gail Rogers, Daniel E. Weiner, Andrew S. Levey, Gerard E. Dallal, Paul F. Jacques, Jacob Selhub, and Irwin H. Rosenberg
Journal of Renal Nutrition, 2012, Volume 22, Number 2, Page 268
[4]
Wolfgang Herrmann
Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine, 2007, Volume 45, Number 12
[5]
Alessandra F. Perna, Diego Ingrosso, Eleonora Violetti, Maria Grazia Luciano, Immacolata Sepe, Diana Lanza, Rosanna Capasso, Elisabetta Ascione, Ilaria Raiola, Cinzia Lombardi, Peter Stenvinkel, Ziad Massy, and Natale G. De Santo
Seminars in Dialysis, 2009, Volume 22, Number 4, Page 351
[6]
Andrie Panayiotou, Andrew Nicolaides, Maura Griffin, Theodosis Tyllis, Niki Georgiou, Richard M Martin, Dawn Bond, Chrysa Tziakouri-Shiakalli, Charis Fessas, and Constantinos Deltas
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, 2009, Volume 13, Number 1, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.