Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

249,00 € / $374.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
December 2008
ISSN:
1437-4331
DOI:
10.1515/CCLM.2008.332

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 249.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 374.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1577.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2365.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1893.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2838.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Lippi, Giuseppe / Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Melichar, Bohuslav / Siest, Gérard / Whitfield, John B. / Abi Fadel, Marianne / Alvarez Menendez, Francisco V. / Azzazy, Hassan M.E. / Diamandis, Eleftherios P. / Eckardstein, Arnold / Favaloro, Emmanuel J. / Griesmacher, Andrea / Herrmann, Wolfgang / Hoffmann, Johannes J.M.L. / Hooijkaas, Herbert / Ichihara, Kiyoshi / Kaabachi, Naziha / Kim, Jeong-Ho / Korte, Wolfgang / Kroupis, Christos / Lai, Leslie Charles / Lam, Wai Kei Christopher / Marc, Janja / Miyoshi, Eiji / Özben, Tomris / Palicka, Vladimir / Panteghini, Mauro / Queralto, Jose M. / Scartezini, Marileia / Simundic, Ana-Maria / Tsongalis, Gregory J. / Wallemacq, Pierre E. / Yan, Shengkai / Young, Ian S. / Chiu, Rossa Wai Kwun / Ghosh, Debabrata / Kappelmayer, Janos / Lehmann, Sylvain / Sypniewska, Grazyna

12 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 2.150
Rank 10 out of 32 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Critical evaluation of connectivity-based point of care testing systems of glucose in a hospital environment

Katelijne M.J. Floré1 / Tom Fiers2 / Joris R. Delanghe3

1Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

2Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

3Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Joris R. Delanghe, Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, Ghent University Hospital 2P8, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium Phone: +32-9-3322956, Fax: +32-9-3324985,

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 46, Issue 12, Pages 1763–1768, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.332, December 2008

Publication History:
Received:
2008-04-07
Accepted:
2008-08-18
Published Online:
2008-12-05

Abstract

Background: In recent years a number of point of care testing (POCT) glucometers were introduced on the market. We investigated the analytical variability (lot-to-lot variation, calibration error, inter-instrument and inter-operator variability) of glucose POCT systems in a university hospital environment and compared these results with the analytical needs required for tight glucose monitoring.

Methods: The reference hexokinase method was compared to different POCT systems based on glucose oxidase (blood gas instruments) or glucose dehydrogenase (handheld glucometers). Based upon daily internal quality control data, total errors were calculated for the various glucose methods and the analytical variability of the glucometers was estimated.

Results: The total error of the glucometers exceeded by far the desirable analytical specifications (based on a biological variability model). Lot-to-lot variation, inter-instrument variation and inter-operator variability contributed approximately equally to total variance. As in a hospital environment, distribution of hematocrit values is broad, converting blood glucose into plasma values using a fixed factor further increases variance. The percentage of outliers exceeded the ISO 15197 criteria in a broad glucose concentration range.

Conclusions: Total analytical variation of handheld glucometers is larger than expected. Clinicians should be aware that the variability of glucose measurements obtained by blood gas instruments is lower than results obtained with handheld glucometers on capillary blood.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1763–8.

Keywords: critically ill patients; hyperglycemia; point of care testing (POCT); quality control; tight glucose monitoring

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.