Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

249,00 € / $374.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
July 2008
ISSN:
1437-4331
DOI:
10.1515/CCLM.2008.176

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 249.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 374.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1577.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2365.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1893.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2838.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Lippi, Giuseppe / Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Melichar, Bohuslav / Siest, Gérard / Whitfield, John B. / Abi Fadel, Marianne / Alvarez Menendez, Francisco V. / Azzazy, Hassan M.E. / Diamandis, Eleftherios P. / Eckardstein, Arnold / Favaloro, Emmanuel J. / Griesmacher, Andrea / Herrmann, Wolfgang / Hoffmann, Johannes J.M.L. / Hooijkaas, Herbert / Ichihara, Kiyoshi / Kaabachi, Naziha / Kim, Jeong-Ho / Korte, Wolfgang / Kroupis, Christos / Lai, Leslie Charles / Lam, Wai Kei Christopher / Marc, Janja / Miyoshi, Eiji / Özben, Tomris / Palicka, Vladimir / Panteghini, Mauro / Queralto, Jose M. / Scartezini, Marileia / Simundic, Ana-Maria / Tsongalis, Gregory J. / Wallemacq, Pierre E. / Yan, Shengkai / Young, Ian S. / Chiu, Rossa Wai Kwun / Ghosh, Debabrata / Kappelmayer, Janos / Lehmann, Sylvain / Sypniewska, Grazyna

12 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 2.150
Rank 10 out of 32 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Strategies of bacteria screening in cellular blood components

Thomas Montag1

1Paul Ehrlich Institute, Section Microbial Safety, Langen, Germany

Corresponding author: Thomas Montag-Lessing, MD, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 51–59, 63225 Langen, Germany

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 926–932, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.176, July 2008

Publication History:
Published Online:
2008-07-14

Abstract

Since the impressive reduction of transfusion-transmitted virus infections, bacterial infections by blood transfusion represent the most important infection risk. Platelet concentrates are the current focus of attention, as they are stored under temperature conditions which allow growth of contaminating bacteria up to 1010 and more microbes per platelet bag. This paper does not consider the pathogen reduction methods but will assess suitable screening methods. Beside conventional microbiological approaches or surrogate markers, several efficient methods able to detect bacterial contamination in platelets are available on the market. They need to be divided into two different methodological principles: the cultivation methods and rapid methods. Cultivation or incubation methods require some time for signal production as they depend on growth of microbes. Thus, they have to be combined with early sampling, i.e., the sample to be examined has to be drawn from the blood component 1 day after donation. Their advantage is the relatively uncomplicated implementation into the logistics of blood banks. Because of the initially very low count of bacteria after donation, a certain small sampling error in application of that strategy remains. Rapid methods are able to produce the diagnosis within a short time. Therefore, they allow postponing of sample drawing, ideally up to the time immediately before transfusion. However, this procedure causes logistic complications. On the other hand, late sampling combined with a rapid method will prevent the transfusion of highly contaminated platelet concentrates leading to acute septic shock up to the death of the patient. Considering the sum of different aspects including the supply of patients, the potential improvement of microbial safety of platelet concentrates is comparable in both strategies.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:926–32.

Keywords: bacteria detection; bacterial contamination of blood; culture methods; improvement of microbial safety of blood; platelet sterility screening; rapid methods; sampling error

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.