Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

249,00 € / $374.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
December 2008
ISSN:
1437-4331
DOI:
10.1515/CCLM.2009.014

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 249.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 374.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1577.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2365.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1893.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2838.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Lippi, Giuseppe / Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Melichar, Bohuslav / Siest, Gérard / Whitfield, John B. / Abi Fadel, Marianne / Alvarez Menendez, Francisco V. / Azzazy, Hassan M.E. / Diamandis, Eleftherios P. / Eckardstein, Arnold / Favaloro, Emmanuel J. / Griesmacher, Andrea / Herrmann, Wolfgang / Hoffmann, Johannes J.M.L. / Hooijkaas, Herbert / Ichihara, Kiyoshi / Kaabachi, Naziha / Kim, Jeong-Ho / Korte, Wolfgang / Kroupis, Christos / Lai, Leslie Charles / Lam, Wai Kei Christopher / Marc, Janja / Miyoshi, Eiji / Özben, Tomris / Palicka, Vladimir / Panteghini, Mauro / Queralto, Jose M. / Scartezini, Marileia / Simundic, Ana-Maria / Tsongalis, Gregory J. / Wallemacq, Pierre E. / Yan, Shengkai / Young, Ian S. / Chiu, Rossa Wai Kwun / Ghosh, Debabrata / Kappelmayer, Janos / Lehmann, Sylvain / Sypniewska, Grazyna

12 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 2.150
Rank 10 out of 32 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Measurement uncertainty in manual differential leukocyte counting

Xavier Fuentes-Arderiu1 / Dolors Dot-Bach2

1Laboratori Clínic, IDIBELL–Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain

2Laboratori Clínic, IDIBELL–Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain

Corresponding author: Xavier Fuentes-Arderiu, Laboratori Clínic, IDIBELL–Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain Fax: +93-2607546,

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 112–115, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.014, December 2008

Publication History:
Received:
2008-07-21
Accepted:
2008-10-09
Published Online:
2008-12-10

Abstract

Background: One of the most frequently requested examinations in the clinical laboratory is the differential leukocyte count. Despite many technological improvements, thousands of differential leukocyte counts are made by microscopic examination of a blood smear, counting 100 leukocytes and expressing the fraction of the specific leukocyte types as percentages (rounded to integer values) of the total leukocyte count. Although in the clinical laboratory it is not usual practice to report measurement uncertainties, currently the ISO 15189 standard considers measurement uncertainty as a very helpful element for a comprehensive interpretation of any measurement result.

Methods: The estimation of the measurement uncertainty of each differential leukocyte count result was carried out according to international guidelines. The sources of standard uncertainty taken into account were: pre-metrological variation, random distribution, between-examiner reproducibility, and rounding to an integer.

Results: In this example, a sample of blood with a concentration number of leukocytes of 3,5×109/L1) is taken into consideration. For each differential leukocyte count result, the standard uncertainties corresponding to each source of measurement uncertainty, as well as the combined and the expanded uncertainties, were estimated with information from the literature.

Conclusions: The procedure presented here to estimate the measurement uncertainty of differential leukocyte count results is appropriate to fulfill the requirements of the ISO 15189 standard related to measurement uncertainty. Knowledge of this uncertainty is helpful in interpreting sequential results obtained in the same patient.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:112–5.

Keywords: differential leukocyte count; interpretation of results; ISO 15189; measurement uncertainty

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.