Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

249,00 € / $374.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
November 2009
ISSN:
1437-4331
DOI:
10.1515/CCLM.2009.316

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 249.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 374.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1577.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2365.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 1893.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 2838.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Editorial Board Member: Lippi, Giuseppe / Gillery, Philippe / Kazmierczak, Steven / Lackner, Karl J. / Melichar, Bohuslav / Siest, Gérard / Whitfield, John B. / Abi Fadel, Marianne / Alvarez Menendez, Francisco V. / Azzazy, Hassan M.E. / Diamandis, Eleftherios P. / Eckardstein, Arnold / Favaloro, Emmanuel J. / Griesmacher, Andrea / Herrmann, Wolfgang / Hoffmann, Johannes J.M.L. / Hooijkaas, Herbert / Ichihara, Kiyoshi / Kaabachi, Naziha / Kim, Jeong-Ho / Korte, Wolfgang / Kroupis, Christos / Lai, Leslie Charles / Lam, Wai Kei Christopher / Marc, Janja / Miyoshi, Eiji / Özben, Tomris / Palicka, Vladimir / Panteghini, Mauro / Queralto, Jose M. / Scartezini, Marileia / Simundic, Ana-Maria / Tsongalis, Gregory J. / Wallemacq, Pierre E. / Yan, Shengkai / Young, Ian S. / Chiu, Rossa Wai Kwun / Ghosh, Debabrata / Kappelmayer, Janos / Lehmann, Sylvain / Sypniewska, Grazyna

12 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 2.150
Rank 10 out of 32 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Development and implementation of an automatic system for verification, validation and delivery of laboratory test results

Gian Cesare Guidi1 / Giovanni Poli1 / Antonella Bassi1 / Luca Giobelli2 / Pier Paolo Benetollo3 / Giuseppe Lippi1

1Laboratorio di Analisi Chimico-Cliniche ed Ematologiche, Azienda Ospedaliera di Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Verona, Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologico-Biomediche, Università di Verona, Verona, Italy

2Servizio Sistemi Informativi, Azienda Ospedaliera di Verona, Verona, Italy

3Direzione Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliera di Verona, Verona, Italy

Corresponding author: Prof. Giuseppe Lippi, Sezione di Chimica Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologico-Biomediche, Ospedale Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale Scuro, 10, 37134 Verona, Italy Phone: +39-045-8124516, Fax: +39-045-8027484, ;

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 1355–1360, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.316, November 2009

Publication History:
Received:
2009-07-04
Accepted:
2009-07-30
Published Online:
2009-11-15

Abstract

Background: The verification/validation of laboratory test results is one of the most critical aspects of the total testing process, which may produce conflicts between competencies and duties at the point of professional crossroads. This process has centered for decades on the human component, with positive effects as well as potential adverse consequences (postanalytical errors). Manual validation of data is a time-consuming activity, is inherently subjective and arbitrary, and requires the constant presence of postgraduate physicians or biologists within the laboratory with adverse economical and organizational impacts. To overcome these inherent limitations, we have developed and implemented in our stat department an automatic system for verification, validation and delivery of laboratory results.

Methods: The procedure is based on automatic validation of test results by an expert system, coupled with remote wireless connection, which allows the laboratory professional “on call” to access, visualize, analyze, validate and deliver alert values (suspect, erroneous or critical) using a small laptop. This system also provides five phases where preanalytical and analytical errors can be identified and handled.

Results and conclusions: Six months following implementation of this innovative system, which can be customized to facilitate a wide variety of laboratory workflow models, the reporting efficiency of our stat laboratory has greatly improved, reducing manual data entry, and increasing the timeliness and utility of test results.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1355–60.

Keywords: information technology; laboratory testing; results; validation; verification

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.