Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario
Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238
Evaluation of the Innovance D-DIMER analytical performance
1Clinical Institute of Laboratory Diagnosis, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb and University School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 945–951, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.219, June 2009
- Published Online:
Background: Widespread use of D-dimer in recent years has led to the development of a number of new fully automated quantitative D-dimer assays.
Methods: We evaluated the analytical performance of the particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay Innovance D-DIMER (Siemens Medical Solutions) on the Behring Coagulation System (BCS) analyzer.
Results: Within-run coefficients of variation (CVs) for samples with low, borderline, slightly, and extremely increased D-dimer concentrations were 2.1%–5.5%, whereas between-run CVs for control samples with low and extremely increased D-dimer were 5.5%–8.4%. The assay exhibited good linearity in the working range between 0.17 mg/L and 5.45 mg/L fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU), with the lower limit of detection of 0.099 mg/L FEU. The upper reference value determined in 40 plasma samples from healthy volunteers was 0.495 mg/L FEU. The results obtained in 457 fresh plasma samples were compared with results obtained with VIDAS D-Dimer Exclusion. Passing and Bablok regression analysis demonstrated highly significant correlation (y=1.370x–0.108, r=0.952, p<0.001). Bland and Altman difference plots demonstrated slightly higher results obtained with Innovance D-DIMER that was more pronounced with increasing values. Very good agreement between both assays was observed (κ=0.860; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.811–0.908).
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that Innovance D-DIMER fulfills all analytical requirements for daily routine use.
Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:945–51.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.