Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)

Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario

Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R. / Tsongalis, Gregory J.

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 2.707
Rank 6 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.741
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 1.011
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 2.310

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Beware of carryover in modern chemistry analyzers

Patrick B. Kyle1

1Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA

Corresponding author: Patrick B. Kyle, Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39232, USA Phone: +1-601-984-2352, Fax: +1-601-984-2885,

Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 519–521, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.092, February 2010

Publication History

Received:
2009-11-13
Accepted:
2009-11-30
Published Online:
2010-02-12

Abstract

Background: Random-access analyzers that employ dedicated probes may be affected by carryover. Sample carryover, involving analyte from one sample that is measured in a subsequent sample, is most often detected in measurement procedures that have wide reportable ranges. However, reagent carryover can be more difficult to detect as it may involve only one pair of measurement procedures.

Methods: Our laboratory noted several patient samples with total cholesterol <2.58 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) during the initial months after a new chemistry analyzer was installed. The problem seemed to occur intermittently, approximately once per week.

Results: Immediate reanalysis of affected samples resulted in measured values that were 1.03–2.58 mmol/L (40–100 mg/dL) higher. Evaluation of reagent carryover revealed a significant decrease in total cholesterol after analysis of creatine kinase (EC 2.7.3.2). Carryover disappeared when an additional reagent probe wash was applied, whereas the root of the problem was eliminated with replacement of the reagent probes. The insidious nature of reagent carryover made it difficult to initially detect the problem, which affected two of the three instruments in our laboratory.

Conclusions: Laboratorians should be aware of the potential for carryover in random access analyzers, and should be mindful of appropriate troubleshooting techniques.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:519–21.

Keywords: c 501; carryover; chemistry analyzer; dedicated pipettor

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.