Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published in Association with the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
Editor-in-Chief: Plebani, Mario
Ed. by Gillery, Philippe / Lackner, Karl J. / Lippi, Giuseppe / Melichar, Bohuslav / Payne, Deborah A. / Schlattmann, Peter / Tate, Jillian R.
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 3.017
Rank 5 out of 30 in category Medical Laboratory Technology in the 2014 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.873
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.982
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 2.238
Calcium pyrophosphate and monosodium urate crystals in synovial fluid as a cause of pseudoeosinophilia
1Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Barmherzige Brueder Graz-Eggenberg, Graz, Austria
2Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Austria
Citation Information: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Volume 49, Issue 8, Pages 1345–1347, ISSN (Online) 1437-4331, ISSN (Print) 1434-6621, DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.212, May 2011
- Published Online:
Background: Synovial fluid (SF) leukocytes can be counted microscopically in a Neubauer chamber or by automated procedures using haematology analysers. Knowledge of laboratory artefacts is crucial for the correct interpretation of results obtained using automated methods. SF pseudoeosinophilia has recently been described as a new artefact in patients with crystal-related arthropathies. We investigated whether pseudoeosinophilia of SF is restricted to crystal-related disorders, or if it may also occur in other arthropathies.
Methods: We compared the percentages of eosinophils in 120 crystal containing SF samples with 185 crystal-free specimens using the Wilcoxon test. Crystal positive samples, determined by polarised microscopy, contained at least two monosodium urate or calcium pyrophosphate crystals per 10 high power fields (630× magnification). True SF eosinophilia was ruled out by microscopic examination of stained slides.
Results: Crystal positive samples had significantly higher percentages of eosinophils than the controls (p<0.0001). No significant differences between the two crystal types were found (p=0.693). Thus, pseudoeosinophilia was significantly correlated with the presence of crystals, and none of the distinct crystal types was more likely to be associated with pseudoeosinophilia.
Conclusions: In this study, SF pseudoeosinophilia was confirmed as a crystal-related laboratory artefact which has to be considered in the interpretation of automated SF leukocyte differential counts.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.