Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 7, 2014

Auto-validation of complete blood counts in an outpatient’s regional laboratory

  • Paul Froom EMAIL logo and Mira Barak

Abstract

Background: The rate of auto-validation is dependent on the ability of the laboratory information system (LIS) to integrate historical data, on the frequency and methods for identifying analyzer errors, and on the criteria for reflex testing, including the need for peripheral smear review. The rate of auto-validation in outpatient laboratories, however, is unclear.

Methods: We examined 45,925 consecutive complete blood count (CBC) test results (1 January, 2014–31 January, 2014) from patients aged 50±24 years. The LIS auto-validates all samples according to set criteria. Technicians validated test results when previous CBC test results were required to determine: 1) the need for peripheral slide review and/or sample rerun or 2) the need for reflex testing to detect autoimmune hemolytic anemia or β-thalassemia minor.

Results: The auto-validation rates were 97.6% after rejecting results requiring validation to determine the need for a peripheral smear review and/or sample rerun. This decreased to 92.9% after including reflex testing to determine the reasons for normocytic and microcytic anemia. We estimated that auto-validation decreased the workload by 7.7–11.6 h per 3000 test results.

Conclusions: We conclude that very high auto-validation rates are possible in outpatient general laboratories, leading to conformity in the validation process and a considerable estimated savings in technician time. Further studies are needed in other settings.


Corresponding author: Prof. Paul Froom, MD, Regional Laboratory, Haifa and Western Galilee, Clalit Health Services, 47 Hatassia, Nesher, Israel, Fax: +972 4 8209052, E-mail:

References

1. Barak M, Jaschek R. A new and effective way for preventing pre-analytical laboratory errors. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:e5–8.10.1515/cclm-2013-0597Search in Google Scholar

2. Froom P, Neck A, Shir M, Haavis R, Barak M. Automatic laboratory-initiated reflex testing to identify patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;124:129–32.10.1309/CFEECW31UYLHUJQGSearch in Google Scholar

3. International Consensus Group for Hematology Review, International Society for Laboratory Hematology. Suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Available from: http://www.islh.org/2004/Committees/ConsensusGroup/CGICGHREview.htm. Accessed on 17 March, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

4. Novis DA, Walsh M, Wilkinson D, St Louis M, Ben-Ezra J. Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review. A College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 95141 Complete blood count determinations performed in 263 Institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:596–601.10.5858/2006-130-596-LPATROSearch in Google Scholar

5. Peterson P, Blomberg DJ, Rabinovitch A, Cornbleet PJ, for the Hematology And Clinical Microscopy Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Physician review of the peripheral blood smear: when and why – an opinion. Lab Hematol 2001;7:175–9.Search in Google Scholar

6. Froom P, Barak M. Prevalence and course of pseudothrombocytopenia in outpatients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:111–4.10.1515/CCLM.2011.013Search in Google Scholar

7. Yamada EJ, Souto AF, de Souza Eda E, Nunes CA, Dias CP. Pseudothrombocytopenia in a patient undergoing splenectomy of an accessory spleen. Case report. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2008;58:488–91.Search in Google Scholar

8. Harrington AM, Ward PC, Kroft SH. Iron deficiency anemia, beta-thalassemia minor and anemia of chronic disease. A morphologic reappraisal. Am J Clin Path 2008;129:466–71.10.1309/LY7YLUPE7551JYBGSearch in Google Scholar

9. Cornbleet PJ. Clinical utility of the band count. Clin Lab Med 2002;22:101–31.10.1016/S0272-2712(03)00069-6Search in Google Scholar

10. Shapiro MF, Greenfield S. The complete blood count and leukocyte differential count. An approach to their rational application. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:65–74.10.7326/0003-4819-106-1-65Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Nigro KG, O’Riordan M, Molloy EJ, Walsh MC, Sandhaus LM. Performance of an automated immature granulocyte count as a predictor of neonatal sepsis. Am J Clin Path 2005;123:618–24.10.1309/73H7K7UBW816PBJJSearch in Google Scholar

12. Froom P, Havis R, Barak M. The rate of manual peripheral blood smear reviews in outpatients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1401–5.10.1515/CCLM.2009.308Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Froom P, Isakov E, Barak M. Criteria for reflex peripheral smear review in infants. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2014;74:366–8.10.3109/00365513.2014.893011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Rabizadeh E, Pickholtz I, Barak M, Froom P. Historical data decrease complete blood count reflex blood smear review rates without missing patients with acute leukaemia. J Clin Pathol 2013;66:692–4.10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201423Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Rabizadeh E, Pickholtz I, Barak M, Isakov E, Zimra Y, Froom P. Acute leukemia detection rate by automated blood count parameters and peripheral smear review. Int J Lab Hematol 2014. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12225. [Epub ahead of print 2014 Apr 7].10.1111/ijlh.12225Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Meer van der W, Scott CS, Keijzer de MH. Automated flagging influences the inconsistency and bias of band cell and atypical lymphocyte morphological differentials. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004;42:371–7.Search in Google Scholar

17. Hoffman JJ. How useful are haematology analyzer flags? [editorial] Clin Chem Lab Med 2004;42:357–8.10.1515/CCLM.2004.064Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Eilertsen H, Vøllestad NK, Hagve TA. The usefulness of blast flags on the Sysmex XE-5000 is questionable. Am J Clin Pathol 2013;139:633–40.10.1309/AJCPDUZVRN5VY9WZSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Sinigaglia R, Gigante C, Bisinella G, Varotto S, Zanesco L, Turra S. Musculoskeletal manifestations in pediatric acute leukemia. J Pediatr Orthop 2008;28:20–8.10.1097/BPO.0b13e31815ff350Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Jones OY, Spencer CH, Bowyer SL, Dent PB, Gottlieb BS, Rabinovisch CE. A multicenter case-control study on predictive factors distinguishing childhood leukemia from juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatrics 2006;117:e840–4.10.1542/peds.2005-1515Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Bain BJ. Diagnosis from the blood smear. N Engl J Med 2005;353:498–507.10.1056/NEJMra043442Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Galloway MJ, Osgerby JC. An audit of the indications for the reporting of blood films: results from the National Pathology Benchmarking Study. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:479–81.10.1136/jcp.2005.035006Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2014-5-29
Accepted: 2014-7-14
Published Online: 2014-8-7
Published in Print: 2015-2-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0572/html
Scroll to top button